@PugJesus to [email protected]English • 16 hours agoCongratulations on Brooklyn's ruleimagemessage-square16arrow-up1370arrow-down19
arrow-up1361arrow-down1imageCongratulations on Brooklyn's rule@PugJesus to [email protected]English • 16 hours agomessage-square16
minus-squareExecutive Chimplinkfedilink3•4 hours agoFun fact: my memory is shitty. Looks like you’re right except that “man” wasn’t gendered at the time.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink4•3 hours ago except that “man” wasn’t gendered at the time. But I included that, didn’t I? and back then “man” still refered to male and female persons Or do you mean rather than male and female, I should have said persons regardless of gender? I guess that makes more sense.
Fun fact: my memory is shitty. Looks like you’re right except that “man” wasn’t gendered at the time.
But I included that, didn’t I?
Or do you mean rather than male and female, I should have said persons regardless of gender? I guess that makes more sense.
Fun fact: I can’t fucking read either.