• KillingTimeItself
    link
    fedilink
    English
    292 days ago

    for everyone who actually uses metric, that’s 198 cm, and 155 cm respectively :)

          • @purple_drank
            link
            123 hours ago

            Are you just being stubborn, or do you really still not understand why adding too many decimal places / significant figures is wrong?

          • KillingTimeItself
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 day ago

            if you just didnt add the decimals i wouldn’t have done it better. So, i would concur there as well.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -12 days ago

          No, but it doesn’t matter. I just provided the exact measurements because I was copy pasting anyways.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            82 days ago

            When the original value is only precise to plus or minus half an inch, it makes no sense whatsoever to do a conversion that’s a hundred times more precise.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                10
                edit-2
                22 hours ago

                It’s not more precise, it becomes inaccurate.

                A man says he’s 6’6". Sure. If he’s anywhere between 6’5½" and 6’6½", that’s true.

                You say he’s 198.12cm tall. The range of this being true is now thinner than a needle. It has gone far beyond what anyone actually measures. In over 99% of cases, it’s not true, and if it is, it won’t be for long, because the human body isn’t nearly that consistent from breath to breath.

                The conversion with spurious false precision has made the number go from true to not true.

                The man is six foot six, yes, true. The man is 198.12cm - no he isn’t.