• This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥
    link
    92 months ago

    That’s true. But I wonder if the creative team thought it would be in bad taste to have an Arab guy as head of global terrorist organization so soon after 9/11

    • Flying Squid
      link
      -22 months ago

      In that case, maybe choose a different villain.

      • This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥
        link
        42 months ago

        Bruh. Since it is a title, it doesn’t matter who is holding it. Even comics Ra’s Al Ghul doesn’t mind that considering he wants Bruce Wayne to be his heir.

        • Flying Squid
          link
          -32 months ago

          Yes, again, you can come up with that convoluted after-the-fact explanation that wasn’t in the movie or you can not piss off Arab people.

            • Flying Squid
              link
              -32 months ago

              Good thing the character isn’t a terrorist then. The head of a cult of assassins is not a terrorist. Assassins target specific people for specific reasons, not to create terror.

                • Flying Squid
                  link
                  -22 months ago

                  Please show me that definition. Assassinations are generally not done to cause terror. They are done to achieve more specific political goals (i.e. get the guy in power out of power).

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    32 months ago

                    So the same definition of terrorism, i.e. specific actions done to further political goals. You’re mad for no reason here

              • This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥
                link
                22 months ago

                They want to destroy a city by means of chemical warfare. They’re absolutely terrorist jfc did you even see the movie?

                • Flying Squid
                  link
                  -22 months ago

                  I thought we were talking about a character that’s the head of a league of assassins, not the actual plot of the movie. You know that the movie didn’t have to have that plot, right? You realize it’s not some sort of requirement to make that specific Batman story, yes?

                  • This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥
                    link
                    32 months ago

                    …What even is your point? In almost every iteration Ra’s al Ghul is trying to destroy Gotham (or Star City in case of CW’s Arrow). He’s absolutely a terrorist.

        • Flying Squid
          link
          -12 months ago

          For the same reason the excuse of a white character being named Mitsimu Hashimori is that it’s just a title being passed down is something people might find offensive.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            22 months ago

            I think artists can make whatever they want (within the bounds of the law) and that it’s up to the consumers to decide whether they like it or not with their wallets.

            • Flying Squid
              link
              02 months ago

              When did this become about what people can do and not about whether or not they’re being highly offensive?

              It is legal to make and distribute a movie where a guy just yells the N-word for 90 minutes. I assume you would find that offensive. Most people would.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                0
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                Right, so I wouldn’t watch it or give them money, and I’m sure you and most other people wouldn’t either. But if that person wants to make it, more power to them.

                It’s been about that the entire thread. The OP image is about casting choices.

                • Flying Squid
                  link
                  12 months ago

                  No one ever said anything about what people can or can not do.