• androogee (they/she)
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -11
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    That’s literally just a longer way of saying that it’s okay if it’s magic but it’s not okay if it’s black people.

    & yeah, I’ll hold my breath for people getting equally upset about white people in fiction. Any day now. I’m sure.

    I can’t disapprove a hypothetical, I guess, but a hypothetical isn’t proof of anything either.

    • @SLVRDRGN
      link
      9
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      But magic doesn’t have any grounding or association with the world as we know it. Neither does aliens. We can only use the world as we know it as a frame of reference for a story.

      I’d argue in lbaudia’s example that it is confusing if in 12th century Mongolia, there was some Nordic guy walking around, I’d imagine there to be a backstory of some kind. If there wasn’t, then that would definitely be an example where I’d be annoyed at white people in fiction.

      I thought a great example of casting was the TV show “The Expanse”. To be able to cast someone as specific as Bobbie Draper so well - these studios have no excuse to whitewash as they do except laziness.

      • Cethin
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 months ago

        I’d argue that magic does have grounding in our world. Sure, we understand today (at leady most of us) that it isn’t real. For most of our history people have believed magic was real though, and attributed real events to magic. We have the word because it has a long history of people thinking it exists. If a story wanted to use “magic” to explain events, that’d be pretty realistic to the times it’s taking place in.

      • androogee (they/she)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -4
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        People made these exact same arguments about the inclusion of a black samurai in an Assassin’s Creed game.

        A black samurai who was based on a real person who actually existed in history.

        The game they’re playing is very obvious to anyone who’s actually paying an ounce of attention, and it has nothing to do with caring about historical accuracy.

        It’s bullshit. It’s an excuse. It’s foolish. I do not suffer it gladly.

        • @SLVRDRGN
          link
          22 months ago

          Yes, and I loved that they wrote the black samurai character into that game to tell that story! I don’t get your point?

          • androogee (they/she)
            link
            fedilink
            English
            0
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            That you are, whether intentionally or unintentionally, toying around with white supremacist propaganda narratives.

            That’s my point.

            Narratives created to influence your mind and radicalize you.

            No one is immune to these influences. Beware.

            • @Ibaudia
              link
              English
              22 months ago

              No, nuance exists and this is ridiculous absolutism lmao.

        • @Ibaudia
          link
          English
          12 months ago

          Assassin’s creed is purely fictional and has very little basis in reality, so no, people do not make the exact same argument about Assassin’s creed, because my argument necessarily excludes it as I have said already lol. Besides, Yaskue was a real person. It’s not even historically inaccurate and his origin is explained.

          Good example, in Castlevania Nocturne they introduce a bunch of multi-ethnic characters and give them all backstories as to how they ended up in 19th century France. I think that’s awesome, and I love to see the thought and effort being put in there. I don’t want these characters to be white, I want them to have a story.