Everyone knows that electric vehicles are supposed to be better for the planet than gas cars. That’s the driving reason behind a global effort to transition toward batteries.

But what about the harms caused by mining for battery minerals? And coal-fired power plants for the electricity to charge the cars? And battery waste? Is it really true that EVs are better?

The answer is yes. But Americans are growing less convinced.

The net benefits of EVs have been frequently fact-checked, including by NPR. "No technology is perfect, but the electric vehicles are going to offer a significant benefit as compared to the internal combustion engine vehicles," Jessika Trancik, a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, told NPR this spring.

It’s important to ask these questions about EVs’ hidden costs, Trancik says. But they have been answered “exhaustively” — her word — and a widerange of organizations have confirmed that EVs still beat gas.

  • @acosmichippo
    link
    English
    2010 hours ago

    I live in Virginia and the other day I saw a Tesla with a custom license plate for friends of coal. like I don’t even…

    • @LifeInMultipleChoice
      link
      24 hours ago

      Wasn’t that what Desantis did, put a coal sticker on his Tesla? Then had dealerships write up a bill to restrict people from purchasing vehicles directly from manufactures without going through a dealership, keeping the costs higher for the people. The bill had an exemption for certain vehicles… Like the Tesla he bought.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      59 hours ago

      I must admit this is a big-brain move — being for electric cars in order to have more coal-fired plants rather than burning gasoline.

      • @AA5B
        link
        89 hours ago

        Even a coal burning EV emits less carbon than a gasoline car. The payback threshold may increase uncomfortably though. A while back I read something doing that analysis per US state. I believe the threshold ranges from 2 year in states with cleaner energy, up to 14 in coal burning West Virginia and Wyoming

        • @Furedadmins
          link
          38 hours ago

          And 14 years isn’t really feasible given battery decay.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            137 minutes ago

            “There are two states that have such shitty electricity production systems that it may take more than the lifetime of an electric car for the carbon emissions to break even. That’s how terrible electric cars are!”

            🙄

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          39 hours ago

          I just find it funny. It’s perfectly logical for someone who really cares about burning more coal to drive an electric car, but I’ve never seen anyone make that connection before. It’s like… I don’t know. A vegan lobbying against lactase pills?

      • @P1nkman
        link
        29 hours ago

        But the coal is cleaned, so it’s better to burn it for electricity. Duh 🙄

    • @miraclerandy
      link
      29 hours ago

      That feels like they’re trolling or making fun of themselves a bit. I know a few people in Kentucky with EVs and they also have “friends of coal” plates.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        25 hours ago

        AFAIK it’s the only way to get a black plate hence why they do it. Looks cleaner on darker cars.