• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 day ago

    Simplex doesn’t support mutli-device. That’s a deal breaker for me. I do 90% of my messaging at my desktop but also want to be able to chat on the go. Using my laptop on the couch is also fairly convenient.

    • mox
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 day ago

      SimpleX also loses messages if you don’t pick them up in time. Going on vacation for a few weeks could be problematic, for example.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          38 hours ago

          The only information that I have is that I personally use it on multiple devices, and I didn’t invent it, I just downloaded the software provided by SimpleX.

      • mox
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        No, it does not. The closest it comes is allowing a PC to take control of a mobile client on the same local network. That might be a convenient way to type with a full-sized keyboard if you have both devices in the same place, but it is not what people mean when talking about multi-device support.

        GP wants the ability to use their account from multiple devices independently. From different locations, not tethered on a LAN. With shared message history, notifications, unread state, identity, etc. That’s what multi-device support means in the context of messaging services.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -221 hours ago

          Device 1: PC Device 2: Phone

          How many devices is that? 2? Sounds like multiple devices to me 🤷‍♂️

          • Encrypt-Keeper
            link
            English
            219 hours ago

            2 devices that can’t function independently. That would make it functionally one device. You’re just splitting hairs now.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -3
              edit-2
              19 hours ago

              2 devices

              Glad we settled that one.

              You’re just splitting hairs now.

              My guy, you’re the one splitting hairs.

              • Encrypt-Keeper
                link
                English
                1
                edit-2
                6 hours ago

                No, lol. “Multi-device” does not just mean “multiple devices can be involved”. It means “Multiple devices can operate independently”

                And you know that. But you’re splitting hairs to try and fit this use case into something it’s not.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -1
                  edit-2
                  6 hours ago

                  No, lol. “Multi-device” does not just mean “multiple devices can be involved”.

                  My guy… “multiple” = >1. “Device” = some sort of electronic. It’s that simple. And you know that. But you’re splitting hairs to try and win an internet argument and misrepresent something you don’t like.

                  • Encrypt-Keeper
                    link
                    English
                    16 hours ago

                    Yes linguistically that’s what the those two words mean.

                    But in the context of a messaging app, “Multi device” becomes one singular term with a set meaning agreed upon by everybody but you, that you’re trying desperately to change by deconstructing the words it’s composed of in order to misrepresent something that you evidently like a whole lot.