vovo to Today I LearnedEnglish • 10 hours agoTIL it’s the right of women of all ages to go topless wherever men can in the states of Wyoming, Utah, Colorado, New Mexico, Kansas and Oklahoma, including all their cities.www.nbcnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square90fedilinkarrow-up1657arrow-down16
arrow-up1651arrow-down1external-linkTIL it’s the right of women of all ages to go topless wherever men can in the states of Wyoming, Utah, Colorado, New Mexico, Kansas and Oklahoma, including all their cities.www.nbcnews.comvovo to Today I LearnedEnglish • 10 hours agomessage-square90fedilink
minus-square@finitebanjolinkEnglish8•6 hours agoBut since its not a protected class I assume businesses can turn them away
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish26•6 hours agoMost businesses will turn away anyone shirtless, especially where health code violations come into play.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•2 hours agoRight. “No shoes. No shirt. No service.”
minus-square@Lost_My_MindlinkEnglish3•3 hours agoWhich is fair. There’s a difference between walking down the street topless and being inside a resteraunt.
minus-square@captainlezbianlinkEnglish9•6 hours agoYeah I’ve gone topless in cities where it’s legal before and you just need to bring a shirt if you plan on eating
minus-squareCaptain AggravatedlinkfedilinkEnglish4•4 hours agoAre tits really that unsanitary that you’re going to infect a restaurant topless? I’ve got nipples, and I think they’re cleaner than my hands because I didn’t touch the door handle with my pecs.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•1 hour agoIt’s something you wouldn’t have a problem with until you sat down in a booth and suddenly your back is covered in some shirtless person’s sweat.
minus-squarevovoOPlinkfedilinkEnglish10•6 hours agoIf they allow it for men they might have to allow it for everybody.
minus-square@finitebanjolinkEnglish1•3 hours agoYes, but the nuance of the situation is selective enforcement. Luckily, many of these explicitly allowed areas are resultant of lawsuits so there is precedent for those discriminated against.
But since its not a protected class I assume businesses can turn them away
Most businesses will turn away anyone shirtless, especially where health code violations come into play.
Right. “No shoes. No shirt. No service.”
Which is fair. There’s a difference between walking down the street topless and being inside a resteraunt.
Yeah I’ve gone topless in cities where it’s legal before and you just need to bring a shirt if you plan on eating
Are tits really that unsanitary that you’re going to infect a restaurant topless? I’ve got nipples, and I think they’re cleaner than my hands because I didn’t touch the door handle with my pecs.
It’s something you wouldn’t have a problem with until you sat down in a booth and suddenly your back is covered in some shirtless person’s sweat.
How do YOU open doors???
If they allow it for men they might have to allow it for everybody.
Sex/gender is a protected class.
Shirted/Shirtless isn’t
The entire point is, where men are allowed to do so.
Yes, but the nuance of the situation is selective enforcement.
Luckily, many of these explicitly allowed areas are resultant of lawsuits so there is precedent for those discriminated against.