Marques Brownlee, known as MKBHD, faced backlash over his new wallpaper app, Panels, due to its high subscription cost ($49.99/year) and concerns over excessive data permissions.

Brownlee acknowledged user feedback, promising to adjust ad frequency for free users and address privacy concerns, clarifying that the app’s data disclosures were broader than intended.

The app, which offers curated wallpapers and shares profits with artists, aims to improve over time, despite criticisms of its design and monetization approach.

      • @Arbiter
        link
        English
        642 months ago

        It would almost be cheaper to commission an artist frankly.

          • @yggstyle
            link
            English
            182 months ago

            Nah it’d be cheaper to commission the artist for a dozen or so pictures for 45 bucks:

            First you need to blow some ungodly amount of money on breaking the time/space barrier… Then travel back to the 1920s and find a starving artist. Then pitch him 45 bucks for some art. Easy! 45 bucks to them is like 800 of our today dollars.

            Sarcasm aside- it seems people really are disconnected on how much a commission or art costs. Sure you can buy prints reasonably priced but any commission that isn’t a speedy doodle is going to clock in a helluva lot higher.

        • MagnyusG
          link
          English
          192 months ago

          For a single piece sure.

          I presume the idea here is that you have access to their full library. Personally, I fail to see why I would change my wallpaper enough to warrant even a free app to change it, let alone 50 bucks.

        • @yggstyle
          link
          English
          102 months ago

          If you know an artist doing commissions that cheap they are depressed, desperate, or want to fuck you.

          • @Arbiter
            link
            English
            132 months ago

            But that’s the best type of artist

            • @yggstyle
              link
              English
              52 months ago

              … why are they always so goddamn hot.

            • @yggstyle
              link
              English
              12 months ago

              One piece digitally drawn in an hour or two maybe. Otherwise it is likely premade, generated, or not their source. Yeah- if you are talking backgrounds for a phone they could be more abstract or start with a base but for 45 bucks? That buys you an hour or two of that artists time- three if they like the idea or you.

        • @Evotech
          link
          English
          2
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Just use a free wallpaper app and pay a random artist 25 bucks

      • JustEnoughDucks
        link
        fedilink
        English
        72 months ago

        Did he disclose an amount?

        5% to artists is very different than 40% to artists.

        Or is he adopting the Spotify bottom line?

        Only pay artists after X downloads and only pay a few cents after thousands of downloads and use the rest for profits

          • JustEnoughDucks
            link
            fedilink
            English
            02 months ago

            50% is quite decent and is 20% higher than most other “decent” services including physical stores. Building and keeping an app up to date with ever changing content requires at least a part time developer which is expensive.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              42 months ago

              Well the baseline is that most wallpaper apps, which don’t pay artists afaik, charge like $5 a year, so if you’re gonna charge me 50, I expect 90% to go to artists

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I’m an artist who has uploaded many of my works to wallhaven entirely for free online, alongside the games I put out and any other creative venture I’ve pursued over the years.

        That part is problematic not relevant.