Dr. Wesker to ShowerthoughtsEnglish • 2 months agoMusic was better when ugly people were allowed to make itmessage-square234fedilinkarrow-up1789arrow-down1147
arrow-up1642arrow-down1message-squareMusic was better when ugly people were allowed to make itDr. Wesker to ShowerthoughtsEnglish • 2 months agomessage-square234fedilink
minus-squareswimlinkfedilink14•2 months agoBut the contention is about music being better, and that’s some bad music.
minus-square@Graphylink20•edit-22 months agoDid we read the same post? Music was better when ugly people were allowed to make it I guess your comment makes sense if you find those two attractive. Like I get the boomer joke of music these days sucks but my comment was leaning into joke.
minus-square@Plastic_Ramseslink3•edit-22 months agoYeah, and Jack White aint pretty either. Imo, this post is better directed at hollywood
minus-squareswimlinkfedilink-4•2 months agoYour comment makes sense in the frame of “ugly people are allowed to make music,” my comment refers to the “music was better” part of the post. The ugly people you mentioned don’t support your comment’s argument against the original assertion because their music is terrible, not “better.” Some music sucked in the boomer’s days, made by ugly and pretty people alike.
minus-square@IAmNotACatlink2•2 months agoHe’s simply disputing the assertion that ugly people aren’t allowed to make music.
minus-squareswimlinkfedilink-1•2 months agoWhy did you reply to my comment to restate the first part of what I said?
But the contention is about music being better, and that’s some bad music.
Did we read the same post?
I guess your comment makes sense if you find those two attractive.
Like I get the boomer joke of music these days sucks but my comment was leaning into joke.
Yeah, and Jack White aint pretty either.
Imo, this post is better directed at hollywood
He looks good enough to me.
Your comment makes sense in the frame of “ugly people are allowed to make music,” my comment refers to the “music was better” part of the post.
The ugly people you mentioned don’t support your comment’s argument against the original assertion because their music is terrible, not “better.”
Some music sucked in the boomer’s days, made by ugly and pretty people alike.
He’s simply disputing the assertion that ugly people aren’t allowed to make music.
Yeah, that’s what the comment you replied to starts with.
Yeah so what’s your problem with what he said then?
Why did you reply to my comment to restate the first part of what I said?