• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    5
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    No it makes sense, this post mentions the corruption of the legal system and how wage labor results in the capitalist class having all the power while producing none of the labor. How is that in any way linked with authoritarianism or military action?

    • @finitebanjo
      link
      -1
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      The part where authoritarians claims to oppose capitalism. There are bad actors who claim the opposite of the outcome of their actions. Thats the nuance of this situation.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        23 months ago

        Still seems strange to comment here, I mean thats a valid argument but this doesn’t seem like the right place.

        • @finitebanjo
          link
          -13 months ago

          This is literally a place that explicitly bans tankies. It’s the place for sure.

            • @finitebanjo
              link
              03 months ago

              This post is literally in a place that explicitly bans tankies. It’s the place for sure.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                13 months ago

                Yeah that doesn’t mean every slightly left wing post is authoritarian, that just comes off as far too accusatory. Shocking news, actual leftists exist on this instance.

                • @finitebanjo
                  link
                  03 months ago

                  I never said the post was improper, I just said be careful and then asked a question that sorts the wheat from the chaff.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -13 months ago

                    A better question would be do the workers need a vanguard/vanguard party and if so how much power should they hold. Meanwhile opposing Nato is universal for pacifists.