• @halcyoncmdr
    link
    English
    198 hours ago

    Yeah, but it’s not a government satellite system, it’s an independent Internet provider. It is always possible that the US government/military has access on the back end, but that’s not guaranteed. And since Ukraine is using Starlink, they can’t exactly just disable all access in the region.

    Kind of makes sense for Russia to try and use Starlink at least a bit to test the waters and see what sort of Intel the US has access to directly through it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13 hours ago

      It is guaranteed, actually. US law imposes requirements on telecoms providers to support wire taps

      • @halcyoncmdr
        link
        English
        23 hours ago

        A wiretap is different than having something like backdoor access at will for military use.

        • @Dioxid3
          link
          English
          1
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          Don me a tinfoil hat, but I think it is absolutely within the realm of possible that half my networked electronics has a backdoor to one or another governmentsl agency. Or that my ”encrypted” WhatsApp conversations are available to US officials if need be.

          Luckily I am as interesting as a slice of bread gone stale

          • @halcyoncmdr
            link
            English
            11 hour ago

            Oh I’m sure that’s the case for nearly all large social media and network systems based on the US. I’m also willing to bet that for some of these companies, almost no one even knows it’s there, either because a 3 letter agency put it there themselves without being noticed, or an employee implemented it for them without corporate approval.

            The US is worried about other countries doing this because we 100% are doing it ourselves. From a national security perspective, it’s basically common sense. Ensure you have access to everything, even if you don’t use it now, you might in the future and it will save time.