• @Valmond
    link
    41 month ago

    No worries, we’ll hit a hard wall somewhere around 5nm because moores law is dead!! \s

    • Alphane MoonOPM
      link
      English
      71 month ago

      Arguably Moore’s law is indeed dead. But that doesn’t mean we can’t get improvements from other areas like advanced packaging, chip power supply and so on…

      • @Valmond
        link
        31 month ago

        You missed the /s I don’t think moores law is that dead.

        • Alphane MoonOPM
          link
          81 month ago

          I guess that would depend on your interpretation of Moore’s law.

          Improvement in semiconductor performance is clearly not dead.

          But “[relatively] easy automatic wins” from moving to a new node are starting to become less common. Prices for new nodes are not getting cheaper (even on a standardized basis), performance/efficiency/size gains are becoming more modest and ramp-up/deployment times are becoming longer and longer.

          • @Valmond
            link
            11 month ago

            Yeah true, no need to nitpick about transistors per mm² :-)

            Stuff gets denser, sometimes more efficient, and it goes on and on, more to the rhyme of international markets today than trying to keep up with old Moore.

            It also feels like the target market have changed (again), from better PCs to handhelds, for example.

        • @stoly
          link
          11 month ago

          But I thought it stopped being correct about ten years ago?

          • @Valmond
            link
            11 month ago

            The chief engineer of Intel predicted that it’d probably be impossible to get to 1um when they broke the 3um barrier.

            Ya, um, not nm. So my bet is it will probably continue, it’s not really a law and everyone interprets it differently too so.