const is more like C++ constexpr, but static is similar to static from C: it’s a variable that lives outside any scope. Of course, that means the same static can be accessed by multiple threads, so writing to a static is unsafe (except for types like Mutex, you can safely use those to write, but your static won’t be declared mut)
RWIIR!!!
edit: here, I did it for you:
use std::*; static mut sucked: bool = false; fn main() { unsafe { check_sucked(); } println!("Kris has been sucked is {}", sucked) } unsafe fn check_sucked() { if !sucked { suck(); } } fn suck() { sucked = true; }edit 2: fixed it
Oh no….
const mut…
I like to live
unsafeIf you made it static, sure, but right now you’re living compiler error
oh well, I’m just starting to learn the language and come from java, so I thought: wait, it can’t be static
const is more like C++ constexpr, but static is similar to static from C: it’s a variable that lives outside any scope. Of course, that means the same static can be accessed by multiple threads, so writing to a static is unsafe (except for types like Mutex, you can safely use those to write, but your static won’t be declared mut)
I personally would have matched the
sucked… Maybe printed some lovely message about being content or somezhin