• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    362 months ago

    It was a term coined to describe the step-by-step process modern tech platforms go through:

    1. be good, get customers, grow
    2. get large enough to corner market, concentrate on profits
    3. get large enough to move to politicise their approach, drive out competition through aggressive tactics, and lock in consumers
    4. drive more profit through dark patterns and ensure nobody wins but the stakeholders

    It’s specifically that, and there wasn’t a word that described that process previously, as it’s only something that’s possible in a modern, “web scale” worldwide platform.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -12 months ago

      Maybe I’m just thinking the crudeness of the term is downplaying the seriousness somewhat.

      I’ll award virtual internet points that you can redeem for absolutely nothing to anyone who can come up with a better term.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Too late. it is a widely used term with a very specific meaning now. that’s language for you. not just modern language. all of language.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32 months ago

            I feel your pain. I am not a native english speaker but I see lots of comparable words come up in my language. I believe they are wrong but I know many “wrong” examples that were wrong a century ago but they are part of the daily language now.

      • @General_Effort
        link
        English
        12 months ago

        Maybe you could call it recoupment but it doesn’t have quite the same ring. It’s not quite the same thing, either.

        You could also talk about coercive monopolies but that doesn’t mean exactly the same thing.