Some just want to promote conflict, cause chaos, or even just get attention.

There has been a lot of research on the types of people who believe conspiracy theories, and their reasons for doing so. But there’s a wrinkle: My colleagues and I have found that there are a number of people sharing conspiracies online who don’t believe their own content.

They are opportunists. These people share conspiracy theories to promote conflict, cause chaos, recruit and radicalize potential followers, make money, harass, or even just to get attention.

There are several types of this sort of conspiracy-spreader trying to influence you.

  • sunzu2
    link
    fedilink
    -107 hours ago

    So you hold your regime to the similar standard?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      6
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Can you ask a coherent question? Who is my regime? You’re not being charged by the word. Be specific.

      • sunzu2
        link
        fedilink
        -16 hours ago

        Owners of the US have fake news run propaganda that has no basis in fact. Do you hold these people as accountable the same way you are doing here with some random Neo nazis farming twattrr for cash?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          86 hours ago

          Owners of the US have fake news run propaganda that has no basis in fact.

          Generalizing this far is not rational or productive. There are varying degrees of quality in US media with varying problems within. Zooming out this far isn’t productive. Might as well go further and say “people lie, therefore nothing can be trusted”. Sounds deep, but is just a futile meaningless statement. Most problems with news media stem from distortions of fact, but obviously do have some basis in fact so right off the bat your premise is faulty.

          Do you hold these people as accountable

          If you’re asking whether I hold media accountable for lying or for bad reporting (no, they are the same. If you can tell the difference that’s on you), then yes I do.

          You’re now far off topic. Spreading baseless conspiracy theories constantly and having some of them be sort of adjacent to the truth isn’t a vindication. It doesnt mean you were right to say what you said.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              7
              edit-2
              5 hours ago

              You guys always prove to be completely incapable of rational thought. It’s why the article triggered you so much.

              • sunzu2
                link
                fedilink
                -55 hours ago

                i explained my position. you offered nothing to rebut tbh

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  4
                  edit-2
                  5 hours ago

                  You explained nothing. I clearly answered your one trivial question and you have no follow up lol.

                  • sunzu2
                    link
                    fedilink
                    05 hours ago

                    There are varying degrees of quality in US media with varying problems within.

                    If you think this, you don’t understand the media and the role it plays within the regime.