@jeffw to politics • 4 hours agoAre you ready for another Bush v. Gore? The Supreme Court is.www.motherjones.comexternal-linkmessage-square17arrow-up186arrow-down10cross-posted to: news[email protected]
arrow-up186arrow-down1external-linkAre you ready for another Bush v. Gore? The Supreme Court is.www.motherjones.com@jeffw to politics • 4 hours agomessage-square17cross-posted to: news[email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink16•edit-24 hours agoShe can just certify the vote for herself and Biden can just “official act” any scenario he wishes— per the $upremely Courted’s rulings and fuckery.
minus-square@Maggotylink2•2 hours agoIn Bush v Gore SCOTUS inserted itself before the constitutional remedy of a congressional ballot could be held. There’s no reason to think they won’t do it again.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•22 minutes agoActually, that’s precisely how one decides if they have the nuts or not.
minus-square@TropicalDingdonglink1•22 seconds agoThe nuts is a poker term. It means having the high hand, or the best possible hand based on the board.
She can just certify the vote for herself and Biden can just “official act” any scenario he wishes— per the $upremely Courted’s rulings and fuckery.
In Bush v Gore SCOTUS inserted itself before the constitutional remedy of a congressional ballot could be held. There’s no reason to think they won’t do it again.
I mean, do you think she has the nuts?
It’s either that… or 1933 Hitler stuff again
You don’t get to decide if you have the nuts or not.
Actually, that’s precisely how one decides if they have the nuts or not.
The nuts is a poker term. It means having the high hand, or the best possible hand based on the board.