• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    313 months ago

    Nitrogen asphyxiation should be effective and painless, but not if the person fights it. Which means it’ll be hard to use as an execution method (unless you surprise them with it somehow)

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        263 months ago

        My understanding is that we can’t detect oxygen deprivation, but we can detect CO² buildup which is the idea behind nitrogen asphyxiation. Wouldn’t regular suffocation (like, something obstructing your airflow) be quite agonizing then in comparison due to CO² buildup?

        • @chuckleslord
          link
          83 months ago

          Complete tangent, but I don’t think superscript numbers are a good choice in chemical notation. You’re trying to use them here to stand-in for subscript numbers, but superscript numbers have a meaning in chemistry as well. They denote ions.

          So, I think CO2 is more accurate than CO², since it could be confused as carbon monoxide with some sort of ion of charge 2 (unclear of positive or negative).

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            63 months ago

            I think Jerboa can do subscript

            CO2

            Yup, looks right for me. It’s a single tilde on both sides of the 2.

            • @stetech
              link
              53 months ago

              There’s a unicode character for it, meaning every decently modern form of text input should support it: CO₂

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            23 months ago

            That’s a good point. My phone keyboard has the superscript so I used that without thinking too much

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            113 months ago

            I want to warn anyone thinking of trying this: don’t.

            Obviously there’s the don’t commit suicide part, and that’s the most important part. But also, as someone who has unfortunately spent time considering various methods, I can tell you: don’t even consider doing it this way.

            Genuinely sorry to be contradictive, but you absolutely would have been in a painful situation if you’d continued. The only explanation is that you didn’t get to the point that your body 100% takes over from you and forces a desperate, painful, writhing attempt to get air.

            You would die of increased CO2 concentration in your blood long before you actually ran out of oxygen. That increased CO2 would be very painful. Like, lizard brain stem absolutely taking over, full panicking levels of painful. Don’t try it!

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              93 months ago

              You DON’T GET the CO2 concentration in proper nitrogen suffocation. Most people that are in oxygen-free environments don’t even realize that it’s happened; they get lightheaded, short of breathe, then black out and die. Any gas that’s heavier than air and isn’t CO2 can cause that kind of suffocation in an enclosed space, which is why SCBA equipment gets used in a lot of industrial applications. For instance, welding in enclosed spaces? The argon or nitrogen can easily kill you before you realize you’re in any danger.

              If you, for instance, connected your CPAP mask to 50# nitrogen tank, and cracked it open, you’d be breathing in straight nitrogen, and exhaling CO2. There would be zero CO2 buildup. As a result, zero panic. The problem is when you try to displace oxygen, but not CO2; you need to be displacing both so that you’re not rebreathing your own CO2.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                33 months ago

                Yes, this is true. Using an inert gas doesn’t cause CO2 toxicity, but rebreathing atmospheric air does.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      53 months ago

      You could give them a sedative. They pass out and can’t hold their breath, then you administer nitrogen. You could probably even find an acceptable oral medication so you wouldn’t require a doctor to administer it. I’m in no way saying this is acceptable, but it isn’t that difficult.

    • @Nomad
      link
      43 months ago

      Surprise execution?! That sounds like fun

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        63 months ago

        Thought experiment:

        Put them in a small sealed room with airflow you control. Using a randomly generated number to pick the start time (within some maximum that’s deemed appropriate), you then throttle up the nitrogen and throttle down the oxygen.

        The time spent in the room would still be pretty terrifying so I doubt it’d be much better than the mask… Maybe the room is their cell and it’s a randomly chosen day within an execution “week” where you make sure they’re asleep first?

        Probably best just to not kill people of course, but if you’re gonna do it, do it the most humane way possible.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          03 months ago

          if you’re gonna do it, do it the most humane way possible.

          M O R T A L    C O M B A A A A A A A A T   ! ! !
          

          That would be colossal.