• @Cocodapuf
    link
    127 minutes ago

    You know there’s a simple and humane way to do it.

    Heroine executions.

  • Billiam
    link
    64 hours ago

    Because executions are things you want to “experiment” with.

    Goddamn fucking ghouls.

    • @CheeseNoodle
      link
      English
      64 hours ago

      They’re fucking it up on purpose, the issue they’ve been having is the mask is a closed loop so there’s a build up of CO2 and it ends up more being a nitrogen augmented smothering than death by true nitrogen asphixiation. Its a very basic issue and I think cruelty is the point, either directly or by falsely discrediting an otherwise humane method of execution (not that any execution is good)

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    198 hours ago

    Nitrogen asphyxiation should be effective and painless, but not if the person fights it. Which means it’ll be hard to use as an execution method (unless you surprise them with it somehow)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      87 hours ago

      Hell, regular suffocation isn’t that bad if you stay calm and relaxed and accept it. It’s all about the state of mind, and someone being murdered isn’t exactly going to be meditative about it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        127 hours ago

        My understanding is that we can’t detect oxygen deprivation, but we can detect CO² buildup which is the idea behind nitrogen asphyxiation. Wouldn’t regular suffocation (like, something obstructing your airflow) be quite agonizing then in comparison due to CO² buildup?

        • @chuckleslord
          link
          248 minutes ago

          Complete tangent, but I don’t think superscript numbers are a good choice in chemical notation. You’re trying to use them here to stand-in for subscript numbers, but superscript numbers have a meaning in chemistry as well. They denote ions.

          So, I think CO2 is more accurate than CO², since it could be confused as carbon monoxide with some sort of ion of charge 2 (unclear of positive or negative).

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          36 hours ago

          It’s certainly not pleasant, but not outright painful. The bad part of it is you feel like you should be panicking and struggling and fighting to breathe. If you’re rebreathing your air, so you’re not prevented from inhaling, and you take long, slow, breaths and keep calm and relaxed, it’s not nearly as unpleasant. I had a near suicide attempt where I gave it a try to see how bad it would actually be and it was scarily not as bad as I thought it would be. Granted I didn’t take it to unconsciousness or I wouldn’t be here to talk about it, but I got to the point my vision was getting fuzzy so I think it’s far enough to draw this conclusion.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            44 hours ago

            I want to warn anyone thinking of trying this: don’t.

            Obviously there’s the don’t commit suicide part, and that’s the most important part. But also, as someone who has unfortunately spent time considering various methods, I can tell you: don’t even consider doing it this way.

            Genuinely sorry to be contradictive, but you absolutely would have been in a painful situation if you’d continued. The only explanation is that you didn’t get to the point that your body 100% takes over from you and forces a desperate, painful, writhing attempt to get air.

            You would die of increased CO2 concentration in your blood long before you actually ran out of oxygen. That increased CO2 would be very painful. Like, lizard brain stem absolutely taking over, full panicking levels of painful. Don’t try it!

    • @Nomad
      link
      27 hours ago

      Surprise execution?! That sounds like fun

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        36 hours ago

        Tbh I would love nothing more than for my friends to throw me a surprise euthanasia party. Reminiscing, having a good time, then they suffocate me or something.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        37 hours ago

        Thought experiment:

        Put them in a small sealed room with airflow you control. Using a randomly generated number to pick the start time (within some maximum that’s deemed appropriate), you then throttle up the nitrogen and throttle down the oxygen.

        The time spent in the room would still be pretty terrifying so I doubt it’d be much better than the mask… Maybe the room is their cell and it’s a randomly chosen day within an execution “week” where you make sure they’re asleep first?

        Probably best just to not kill people of course, but if you’re gonna do it, do it the most humane way possible.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          07 hours ago

          if you’re gonna do it, do it the most humane way possible.

          M O R T A L    C O M B A A A A A A A A T   ! ! !
          

          That would be colossal.

          • Cosmonaut_Collin
            link
            16 hours ago

            Only if they make it a live sporting event and I can buy a churro while watching. I guess I just want the Roman Colosseum back.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    9
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    It’s both cruel and unusual. -Until states keep “trying” it. Then it becomes just cruel, and that will make it constitutional.

    Cruel as usual.