• @givesomefucks
    link
    English
    6
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    And that’s cool…

    As long as when people want her to align more closely with the Dem voting base, you don’t yell at them for questioning the only option and imply they’re trying to help trump.

    That bullshit only depresses Dem turnout and actually helps trump.

    It’s just completely nonsensical to hear all the “moderates” claim they’d vote for anyone not trump, then go feral when someone points out banning fracking would hand the Dems Pennsylvania which trump needs to win the election.

    There are multiple issues like that where if Kamala moved to the left she’d lock this election down.

    If you truly only care about beating trump, your time online would be more productive trying to pull the party left than trying to pull tens of millions of voters to the right…

    With the obvious benefit of getting those popular policies on top of beating trump.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      36 hours ago

      If it’s not been posted already…

      https://theintercept.com/2024/09/10/polls-arms-embargo-israel-weapons-gaza/

      Banning sales of arms to Israel would not only attract a huge proportion of otherwise reluctant leftists, but might even steal votes from Trump as a small but not insignificant number of voters have been fooled by his ‘started no wars’ con. The idea that doing so would lose some key demographic is clearly not supported by the data.

      But the Democratic strategists are not idiots. They must know this. So one of two things is the case; the polling is wrong, or the Democrats have absolutely no desire to move leftward on this and are willing to risk a Trump win to hold out on their position.

      We can rule out the first because if the Democrats had better poll data they’d share it. Nothing to lose by doing so.

      So we’re left with the second.

      Odd then that the online vitriol is delivered not to the Democrats for cynically risking a Trump victory, but to leftists for being opposed to genocide.

      • @givesomefucks
        link
        English
        86 hours ago

        The idea that doing so would lose some key demographic is clearly not supported by the data.

        They wouldn’t lose significant voters, theyd lose a bunch of donations…

        It doesn’t cost a billion plus to beat donald trump, but the more money there is, the bigger everyone’s slice is and the bigger the bonuses for personally bringing more money is.

        The DNC isn’t being run to get Dems in office, it’s a fucking grift where sometimes we do get a Dem in office.

        Just never one who’s political policy matches Dem voters.

        Look at current DNC leadership, it’s not people that know how to win elections, it’s just whoever can bring in the most donations.

        The result is ridiculously expensive and incompetent campaigns. The solution is clearing house at the DNC.

        • @PugJesus
          link
          English
          12 hours ago

          It doesn’t cost a billion plus to beat donald trump,

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          05 hours ago

          The DNC isn’t being run to get Dems in office, it’s a fucking grift where sometimes we do get a Dem in office.

          True. And a cushy consulting job, or a few thousand in bonuses seems like an understandable inventive, if a misanthropic one.

          But for those who do the footwork supporting such a system, I just cannot see why. What have the Democrats done to deserve such blind obedience? Is being not-Trump just that impressive these days?

          • @TexasDrunk
            link
            62 hours ago

            Is being not-Trump just that impressive these days?

            Today? Yes. Come inauguration day? Absolutely fucking not. If Kamala wins I’ll talk shit, write letters, donate to causes, protest, and cause trouble from the first day she’s in office until the end of primary season 4 years from now. Then I’m back on the train.

            Unless we can get rid of FPTP. Then I’m talking shit every day all fucking day long while happily voting for a candidate who agrees with me most instead of the one I disagree with the least.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              119 minutes ago

              If Kamala wins I’ll talk shit, write letters, donate to causes, protest, and cause trouble from the first day she’s in office until the end of primary season 4 years from now

              Why?

      • bobburger
        link
        fedilink
        -95 hours ago

        This is absolutely correct. I’m sure the 40% of voters who want to keep sending weapons to Israel aren’t even Harris voters. So clearly the Democratic party is only doing it for the love of genocide and it seems obvious that after they finish the genocide in Gaza and Lebanon they’ll shift their focus to genocide of Palestinians and other arabs living in America. This is completely unacceptable to me which is why I voted for Trump.

        I thought about voting for a third party but I live in a swing state and want to minimize the chances of Koncentration Kamp Kamala from getting elected so I directly supported Trump rather than indirectly.

        • ArxCyberwolf
          link
          fedilink
          52 hours ago

          “Koncentration Kamp Kamala”

          Listen to yourself. You’re beyond delusional. Seek help.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          9
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          Sooooo… because you can’t be bothered to understand how things work. You voted for someone that suggests that Israel “finish the job.”

          That sure showed those pesky libs!

          You’re about as bad-faith as it gets. You’re MAGA, through and through. Drop the act that it has anything to do with genocide.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -24 hours ago

          I live in a swing state and want to minimize the chances of Koncentration Kamp Kamala from getting elected so I directly supported Trump rather than indirectly.

          I could no more vote Trump ‘tactically’ than I could Harris. I think one ought vote according to one’s concience. The whole notion of tactical voting makes a mockery of democracy, if no one could be persuaded to vote tactically there’d be significantly less ‘electioneering’. More like the Nordic model, with way more parties catering to a broader range of political views.

          You only have to look at the current Democrat campaign, they barely need a policy at all, they’re running almost entirely on being not-Trump.