• @kevindqc
      link
      112 months ago

      That’s not what I said.

      • Socialist Mormon SatanistOP
        link
        -21
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        By your logic, anyone who votes for anyone is “helping” someone else.

        If I truly wanted to help Trump, I would have voted for him—not a third-party candidate. So no, I didn’t help Trump. I also didn’t help Harris–and that’s your main point.

        And I’m proud I didn’t help Harris. Because I didn’t want to vote for her. Thank you! :)

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          122 months ago

          I didn’t especially “want” to brush my teeth last night, but I did anyway. Because I know that the alternative is opening up the door to things I don’t want, even more than I don’t want to brush my teeth.

          If someone woke up and said, I’m proud I didn’t brush my teeth, because I didn’t want to, I would have trouble looking at them as a source of wisdom about how to accomplish the goals they’re trying to pursue.

          • Socialist Mormon SatanistOP
            link
            -172 months ago

            Cute analogy, But that doesn’t apply to voting because voting isn’t a routine obligation—it’s an opportunity to choose what you believe in.

            Just like choosing not to brush your teeth doesn’t change the necessity of dental hygiene, choosing to vote third party isn’t ignoring reality, it’s actively rejecting a system that fails to represent true change. Thanks! :)

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              122 months ago

              Just like choosing not to brush your teeth doesn’t change the necessity of dental hygiene

              choosing to vote third party isn’t ignoring reality

              You’re so close to getting it. Millimeters away.

                • EleventhHour
                  link
                  9
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  Yeah, for Trump. Because that’s what a vote for Jill Stein is.

                  Your refusal to accept reality in circular logic does not make you correct.

                  • geekwithsoul
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    42 months ago

                    No, they’re voting for Pro-Israel candidate Rachele Fruit. Quoted earlier this year:

                    And anyone who is interested in reading and learning about the history of Hamas will be convinced that it’s not about liberation. It’s about genocide against the Jews.

                  • Socialist Mormon SatanistOP
                    link
                    -152 months ago

                    No, a vote for Trump is a vote for Trump. A vote for Stein is a vote for Stein.

                    I’ve already voted. And I didn’t vote for Stein. Or Trump. Or Harris. Thank you! :)

            • finley
              link
              fedilink
              English
              32 months ago

              But that doesn’t apply to voting because voting isn’t a routine obligation

              Voting is routine and an obligation. Brushing those one’s teeth is not “a moral or legal duty”. Your reasoning is flawed.

                • finley
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  4
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  Nobody claimed that voting was compulsory. Just an obligation. Those aren’t the same thing.

                  So you know that what you said was false. Then why did you say that?

                  • Socialist Mormon SatanistOP
                    link
                    -112 months ago

                    Not everyone feels it’s an obligation. Plenty of people don’t vote. I did though. Thank you! :)

            • finley
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Rejecting the system by participating in it? And how does a candidate that will definitely never win “represent change“?