• @givesomefucks
    link
    English
    -1
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    But I guarantee you the Harris campaign has done the cost-benefit analysis. They could be wrong because nothing in politics is 100%, we’ll just have to see.

    Are you not aware of the overlap with the 2016 and 2020 campaigns?

    2020 we won by literally tens of thousands of votes, it worked but just barely and mostly because trump was already in office.

    The people running this campaign and the dnc don’t know what the fuck they’re doing. They’ve locked in as donations as a metric and only chase that one single metric, even to the point of ignoring votes.

    It’s ok to criticize them, we’re not Republicans

    • @acosmichippo
      link
      English
      1
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      i’m not saying you’re not allowed to criticize them. i just doubt that you know better than they do. just because the elections are close doesn’t mean your strategy is better. they are fighting an uphill battle with the electoral college and too much money in politics, on both sides.

      • @givesomefucks
        link
        English
        02 months ago

        i just doubt that you know better than they do.

        If you look at who “they” are, it’s mostly the people who couldn’t beat trump in 2016 and barely beat him in 2020 after Sanders drug them kicking and screaming to the left in the primary

        We didn’t get that this year, no one is dragging Kamala left…

        They’re not “the best at what they do” except in raising donations, seriously, look I to the people running shit, they’re in positions of power because they brought in the most money, they’re always going to side with the money because their metric is how much they can bring in.

        It is not a good way to run a political party, and most voters don’t even know it’s happening.

        • @acosmichippo
          link
          English
          12 months ago

          we’re going in circles, I have already addressed all these points.