@[email protected] to Science [email protected]English • 2 days agoScientific Methodmander.xyzimagemessage-square16fedilinkarrow-up1727arrow-down13
arrow-up1724arrow-down1imageScientific Methodmander.xyz@[email protected] to Science [email protected]English • 2 days agomessage-square16fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish52•2 days agoI’ll take a no any day over an " I dunno,maybe, probably not, your methods might have been totally backwards and there’s not enough funding to ever do this again the right way." that’s often what data seems to whisper to me.
minus-squareToes♀linkfedilinkEnglish5•2 days agoMy personal favourite is “are you sure that’s in the design specs?”
I’ll take a no any day over an " I dunno,maybe, probably not, your methods might have been totally backwards and there’s not enough funding to ever do this again the right way." that’s often what data seems to whisper to me.
My personal favourite is “are you sure that’s in the design specs?”