@[email protected] to Science [email protected]English • 3 months agoScientific Methodmander.xyzimagemessage-square16fedilinkarrow-up1751arrow-down13
arrow-up1748arrow-down1imageScientific Methodmander.xyz@[email protected] to Science [email protected]English • 3 months agomessage-square16fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish52•3 months agoI’ll take a no any day over an " I dunno,maybe, probably not, your methods might have been totally backwards and there’s not enough funding to ever do this again the right way." that’s often what data seems to whisper to me.
minus-squareToes♀linkfedilinkEnglish5•3 months agoMy personal favourite is “are you sure that’s in the design specs?”
I’ll take a no any day over an " I dunno,maybe, probably not, your methods might have been totally backwards and there’s not enough funding to ever do this again the right way." that’s often what data seems to whisper to me.
My personal favourite is “are you sure that’s in the design specs?”