• @chuckleslord
      link
      1713 hours ago

      In Georgia? Definitely. They’d be consistently blue if not for republican ratfucking

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      73
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      Yep. Increased turnout in the states tends to correlate positively with a bluer outcome in a statistically significant fashion. Which is also why the GOP is constantly bleating about “voter fraud” (which is actually vanishingly rare these days, with most instances actually being perpetrated by republican voters trying to “combat” this fictional voter fraud), engaging in electoral fraud and partisan gerrymandering (which is NOT rare, particularly in red states), and generally making it harder for people to vote.

      They know that they’re demographically on the losing side, and they’re trying to plug the dam with their fingers.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -24 hours ago

        Its just as likely to affect poor republican voters as poor democrat voters. I don’t know that increased turnout is an obvious benefit for one party. I would prefer if those who could vote do, but keep in mind there are disenfranchised voters. In Georgia I think its somewhere around 5% of adults aren’t allowed to vote.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          150 minutes ago

          I mean… this isn’t my opinion. You can look the data and studies up yourself. It’s not hard.

      • @proudblond
        link
        English
        2918 hours ago

        I was listening to Jon Stewart’s most recent Weekly Show podcast and he had Stacey Abrams on, and she said that increased voter turnout benefits dems right now because the Republicans have power but have generally unpopular policies, but it has been flipped in the past.