@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 day agoMisgendering does not rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square64fedilinkarrow-up1579arrow-down124
arrow-up1555arrow-down1imageMisgendering does not rulelemmy.blahaj.zone@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 day agomessage-square64fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink7•5 hours agoYes, but actually no. Using deadnames of companies is much more acceptable than for people.
minus-square@Glytchlink3•1 hour agoDespite what the Supreme Court will tell you, corporations aren’t actually people, so you don’t have to worry about dead naming them.
minus-square@samus12345linkEnglish4•5 hours agoDeadnaming is not necessarily misgendering. Sometime people have deadnames for reasons other than gender.
Yes, but actually no. Using deadnames of companies is much more acceptable than for people.
Despite what the Supreme Court will tell you, corporations aren’t actually people, so you don’t have to worry about dead naming them.
Deadnaming is not necessarily misgendering. Sometime people have deadnames for reasons other than gender.