@[email protected] to [email protected] • 4 months agoMisgendering does not rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square67fedilinkarrow-up1621arrow-down127
arrow-up1594arrow-down1imageMisgendering does not rulelemmy.blahaj.zone@[email protected] to [email protected] • 4 months agomessage-square67fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink10•4 months agoYes, but actually no. Using deadnames of companies is much more acceptable than for people.
minus-square@Glytchlink9•4 months agoDespite what the Supreme Court will tell you, corporations aren’t actually people, so you don’t have to worry about dead naming them.
minus-square@samus12345linkEnglish6•4 months agoDeadnaming is not necessarily misgendering. Sometime people have deadnames for reasons other than gender.
Yes, but actually no. Using deadnames of companies is much more acceptable than for people.
Despite what the Supreme Court will tell you, corporations aren’t actually people, so you don’t have to worry about dead naming them.
Deadnaming is not necessarily misgendering. Sometime people have deadnames for reasons other than gender.