• RubberDuck
    link
    English
    821 month ago

    Just make carrier locking illegal and have customers pay the actual price, now it’s just hidden costs to the consumer.

    • HobbitFoot
      link
      fedilink
      English
      121 month ago

      It isn’t been a hidden cost for a while. Phone companies sell the phones at full price, but consumers want the 2 year 0% APR financing.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 month ago

        If consumers bought the phones from a third party, there’d be absolutely no reason to lock the phone to a carrier. But when carriers also provide the financing, there’s an incentive to keep them on the service until the bill is paid. Screw that.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            121 month ago

            Then don’t buy a $1k device, and instead buy something you can afford?

            Otherwise, there are tons of buy now, pay later services, so you could just use any of those.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              141 month ago

              Not go into debt to upgrade something that actually in most cases doesn’t need upgrading. What a amazing thought.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                4
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                Yup. I upgraded my phone because it ran out of software updates (had for >3 years). My new phone cost <$400 and has >5 years of software support, if the hardware lasts that long. A $1k device is not necessary and is a luxury item, and you shouldn’t go into debt for luxuries…

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  31 month ago

                  Exactly. I started buying my phones at full price unlocked in 2016 when I switched to a mobile virtual network operator and I’ve never gone back to $1,000 phones because losing $1,000 from your Monero wallet hurts bad.

                  • @njordomir
                    link
                    English
                    11 month ago

                    I’ve been doing the same. It makes traveling easier too. It costs way less to get a local sim for an unlocked phone you own than to pay the carrier to allow you to use a locked phone overseas.

                    At home, MVNOs, for me, were basically what the rest of the world had. The big carriers kept pushing phones, the MVNOs were simpler, quicker, and less scammy. Eventually I found a non-MVNO T-Mobile prepaid plan that gave me unlimited SMS, 100min. Talk, and 5-6GB data (which they deceptively call unlimited 👎, but was more than enough for me)

                    The site run by the greedy little pigboy used to have a “nocontract” community for discussing the best plans, they had a big google sheet and lots of research, but it seems someone infiltrated it because they no longer list the best deals.

          • @Kbobabob
            link
            English
            21 month ago

            Until you realize that things like wifi calling have to be an at&t phone. Unless they’ve changed this in the last few years.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 month ago

              What do you mean? Quick Google shows that T-Mobile allowed wireless calling back in 2007.

              • @Kbobabob
                link
                English
                01 month ago

                I didn’t mention T-Mobile

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 month ago

            There are tons of buy now, pay later services, and they make money through revenue sharing w/ the retailer, as well as when people fail to pay back the loan on time.

            But ideally, this would just put downward pressure on phone prices as people look to buy phones w/ cash instead of going into debt.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                21 month ago

                Honestly any moderately expensive item can be purchased through installments. Go to any electronics store and they’ll have offers like that, and they use different services to provide that financing.

                It’s a non-issue, carriers don’t need to be a party to that at all. I can literally go to BestBuy or Apple and get 0% financing on a new phone and take it to any carrier I want.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 month ago

                  You know what you’re talking about. It’s nice to see that.

                  But if carriers didn’t have phones for sale everyone would be mad about it. They might have even been mad in the beginning, so the carriers started selling phones too.

          • @mightyfoolish
            link
            English
            11 month ago

            PayPal credit is an option. No interest if you pay it off in 6 months.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 month ago

      You’re going off of phone contracts that haven’t been around for a decade. The cost of the phone up front, and has been for a long time.

      • RubberDuck
        link
        English
        11 month ago

        Then carrier locking should just be plain illegal.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -5
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          They lock it so you’ll pay for the phone. That’s the only reason.
          Should requiring people to pay for things be illegal?

          Frankly you’re being ignorant, and expect to somehow get a thousand dollar device for free. That’s not how the world works.

          • RubberDuck
            link
            English
            31 month ago

            Wha? The guy I responded to said the customers now pay full price up front. If a device is bought it should be unlocked.

            Additionally giving away a phone for a determined time contract means that the company is technically giving you a loan and it should be on your credit record, require the company to do a proper credit check and be allowed to give out loans.

            Bottom line, it’s predatory and should not be allowed. Noone is advocating giving 1000 dollar phones for free… it was a strawman you stuck me with… but I don’t want it.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Wha? The guy I responded to said the customers now pay full price up front.

              No. I never said that. I said the cost of the phone is upfront. There are no 2 year contracts anymore, and haven’t been for at least a decade. You see the full price of the phone, and decide how much a month you want to spend to pay it off.

              If a device is bought it should be unlocked.

              I agree with you. And that’s how it works. The question is how long after paying off the phone should it be locked.

              Additionally giving away a phone for a determined time contract …

              Again, they haven’t offered contracts like that in ten years. But yes you do need to pass a credit check to have a phone financed.

              Bottom line, it’s predatory and should not be allowed.

              What exactly should not be allowed?

              • RubberDuck
                link
                English
                21 month ago

                OK so you buy the phone on a payment plan… and credit check. Then once it’s paid off it should be unlocked.

                  • RubberDuck
                    link
                    English
                    11 month ago

                    Here in the Netherlands they don’t allow carrier locking and still sell on these installment plans.

                    They are 2 separate services (telecom & financing) and thus cannot be linked at sale. That’s not an issue… why would it be different in the US?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 month ago

            You can continue paying at&t for the phone after moving to a different carrier.

            How do you think people will steal phones like this?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 month ago

              When did that become possible?
              Last I knew is when you cancel your account (which is what moving to another carrier is) they billed you for the remaining balance of the phone.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                21 month ago

                No I mean thats what’s proposed. I’m saying leaving the companies service has nothing to do with a loan they gave you. They are separate things. Its possible they would stop with no interest but I believe they can still make money without interest in some cases.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  21 month ago

                  Ah gotcha. Yeah that’d be cool. I hope it works out. More options is always better.
                  Your probably right about the interest, or else why would they agree to it.