• @InputZero
    link
    English
    9
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    Unfortunately there’s a bit of pressure to osbficate the core idea of a publication in academia. While the ideal academics try to hold themselves to is to freely exchange information, for researchers who are paid to study very neiche topics there’s an insensitive to put some resistance into others entering their field. There is only so much funding and one more team means more competition. So some researchers who find themselves in that position will intentionally complicate their published work as a way to create a disincentive to others from crowding their field. It sucks but the reality is that funding and money come before the faithful pursuit of knowledge.

    Also, some people just suck at writing.

      • @dejected_warp_core
        link
        English
        211 hours ago

        As a (perhaps unintentional) slip, “an insensitive” works rather well here. Gatekeeping your field in a forum of open(ish)1 information exchange is just categorically “not nice”.

        Personally, I would have opted for a portmanteau like “incentsitive”.


        1 - Paywalls notwithstanding.

        • @Madison420
          link
          English
          19 hours ago

          It doesn’t fit in context, they clearly meant incentive.

      • Kallioapina
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        Bad grammar nazi, there are several other typos! Bad!

        • @Madison420
          link
          English
          211 hours ago

          I just catch the ones the news with my dyslexia.