The company behind Trump Watches prominently features an iconic image of the presidential candidate on its timepieces. There’s one big problem: It’s not allowed to.

According to the Associated Press, though, TheBestWatchesonEarth LLC advertised a product it can’t deliver, as that image is owned by the 178-year-old news agency. This week, the AP told WIRED it is pursuing a cease and desist against the LLC, which is registered in Sheridan, Wyoming. (The company did not reply to a request for comment about the cease and desist letter.)

Evan Vucci, the AP’s Pulitzer Prize–winning chief photographer, took that photograph, and while he told WIRED he does not own the rights to that image, the AP confirmed earlier this month in an email to WIRED that it is filing the written notice. “AP is proud of Evan Vucci’s photo and recognizes its impact,” wrote AP spokesperson Nicole Meir. “We reserve our rights to this powerful image, as we do with all AP journalism, and continue to license it for editorial use only.”

  • @Aeri
    link
    173 hours ago

    I mean I’ll lead by saying “fuck Trump” however I would be a little annoyed if I wanted to use a depiction of myself and someone came to yell at me about it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      71 hour ago

      Well yes and no.

      A famus artist may sell a picture of theirs to a company, them RHAT company has the copyright, not you.

      Lots of artists don’t own their music, don’t own their likeness either.

    • @Furedadmins
      link
      102 hours ago

      Yeah try getting copies of a copyrighted portrait made. Wedding photos, school portraits, you name it. Not yours.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -22 hours ago

      Agreed. Hate to be that person but I definitely agree with you. It’s literally a picture of himself. I detest the man but this is dumb to be fair.

      • @MirthfulAlembic
        link
        English
        436 minutes ago

        It’s really not dumb. If copyright law worked that way, no photographer who included human subjects would be able to make a living. Artists deserve to be able to sustain themselves from their labor.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          18 minutes ago

          no photographer who included human subjects would be able to make a living.

          Sounds great to me! But then, I’m a deranged lunatic from the Taliban

      • @chiliedogg
        link
        192 hours ago

        I do some professional photography. If I take a picture, I own it unless there’s a written agreement that says otherwise. You can’t claim ownership rights of a photo just because you’re in it - especially a photo taken in a public space.

      • @kaffiene
        link
        English
        -145 minutes ago

        Welcome to copyright law