• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      06 hours ago

      In the name of stupid internet arguments it wasn’t though. You were referring to a financial loss.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        I see what you mean. I did mean both, and I should have made it clearer. Sorry. Fixed it

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          24 hours ago

          Well that’s very non internet of you. Thankfully I found someone else to bicker with about it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            13 hours ago

            😂 fucking fuck you you fucking piece of shit asshole you human garbage waste of oxygen you are. Is that what you mean by internet of me?

      • @dezmd
        link
        English
        05 hours ago

        In the name of even dumber stupid internet arguments, it was. Data loss along with the price paid was an obvious inference.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          04 hours ago

          I don’t see it. Original statement applies perfectly well to an expensive blender for example.

          • @dezmd
            link
            English
            03 hours ago

            And yet the entire context is discussing an expensive SSD that would go bad, inherently implying data loss as part of the inferred outcomes. Not a blender or a crock pot or the LCD display of a 1997 Honda Civic radio.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              13 hours ago

              It’s the wrong explicit emphasis though. Faced with a bad 8tb drive my primary concern would likely be the data loss. It’s pretty well known these drives have a five year warranty as well, so if it were bricked even, you’d likely be able to get the money back / drive replaced.