• Rikudou_Sage
      link
      fedilink
      English
      951 month ago

      Not OP, but what puts me off is that it calls itself badger, but really it’s just a software that has nothing in common with those glorious animals. Did you know that badgers’ keen sense of smell is about 800 times sharper than our own?

    • @Dasnap
      link
      361 month ago

      I think UBO makes it redundant.

      • @friend_of_satan
        link
        English
        131 month ago

        The layered security model has redundancy built in as a feature.

    • TuxOP
      link
      English
      201 month ago

      Well, it can be replaced with uBlock Origin and some people dont recomend it anymore

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      131 month ago

      Privacy Badger has historically allowed tracking until it successfully identifies a domain as a likely tracker. Like the air bags going off after you’ve already wrapped your car around a telephone pole. But it’s now been changed and is now closer to a list-based tracker blocker (enumerate badness):

      Privacy Badger no longer learns from your browsing by default, as “local learning” may make you more identifiable to websites.

      They’ve since corrected one of the core issues with PB by doing so, but it still it is very weak. To see why, please glance through The Six Dumbest Ideas in Computer Security.

      uBlock Origin in advanced mode, with default-deny rules (only allow assets by exception) is going to be much stronger at blocking crap.

      Personally, I use uMatrix with pretty much all asset classes blocked by default. I never see popups. I never see banners begging “please allow our cookies, pleeeeaaase!”.