• @errer
    link
    English
    51 hour ago

    Need to add a pihole to that stack

  • lime!
    link
    fedilink
    English
    135 minutes ago

    the return dislike plugin is just stupid. it’s a community database now, so rather than being based on the actual number of dislikes on youtube it’s based on the dislikes of the people who have the plugin.

    it used to be that it actually got the real numbers but youtube removed that endpoint so now it’s just a misanthropic echo chamber.

  • slazer2au
    link
    English
    254 hours ago

    Consent-o-matic instead of cookies and adnausem instead of ublock origin.

    Consent-o-matic will actively opt out of popups.

    Adnausem is built on top of ublock origin and will silently “click” on the ads behind the scenes to mess up your advertising profile and cost the advertisers money.

  • @Zachariah
    link
    63 hours ago

    Pretty soon, Firefox will need to be replaced with Waterfox and LibreWolf, unfortunately.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      247 minutes ago

      Privacy Badger has historically allowed tracking until it successfully identifies a domain as a likely tracker. Like the air bags going off after you’ve already wrapped your car around a telephone pole. But it’s now been changed and is now closer to a list-based tracker blocker (enumerate badness):

      Privacy Badger no longer learns from your browsing by default, as “local learning” may make you more identifiable to websites.

      They’ve since corrected one of the core issues with PB by doing so, but it still it is very weak. To see why, please glance through The Six Dumbest Ideas in Computer Security.

      uBlock Origin in advanced mode, with default-deny rules (only allow assets by exception) is going to be much stronger at blocking crap.

      Personally, I use uMatrix with pretty much all asset classes blocked by default. I never see popups. I never see banners begging “please allow our cookies, pleeeeaaase!”.

    • Rikudou_Sage
      link
      fedilink
      English
      474 hours ago

      Not OP, but what puts me off is that it calls itself badger, but really it’s just a software that has nothing in common with those glorious animals. Did you know that badgers’ keen sense of smell is about 800 times sharper than our own?

    • @Dasnap
      link
      154 hours ago

      I think UBO makes it redundant.

      • @friend_of_satan
        link
        English
        52 hours ago

        The layered security model has redundancy built in as a feature.

    • TuxOP
      link
      English
      104 hours ago

      Well, it can be replaced with uBlock Origin and some people dont recomend it anymore

  • @MTK
    link
    43 hours ago

    Librewolf

  • @10_0
    link
    -363 hours ago

    Replace Firefox with brave and you’re set

    • @yesman
      link
      145 minutes ago

      Being a chromium based browser, they’re fixing to loose access to the same features that’s killing Ublock. So in the near future, the Brave CEO is still going to be a cunt, but your ad-blocking is going to be forever inferior.

    • @Spoilt
      link
      193 hours ago

      Are you talking about the browser that added its own referral codes in cryptocurrency sites?

      (Yeah, maybe I’m a bit vindictive…)

      • @10_0
        link
        -113 hours ago

        People can hate, but the shield is more convenient than uBlock. I know because I had uBlock origin and noscript back I’m the day. Too bad I tend to separate the app from its creator because it’s beneficial for me.