FenrirIII to politics • 1 month ago50 years of tax cuts for the rich failed to trickle down, economics study sayswww.cbsnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square120arrow-up11.2Karrow-down17cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]economics
arrow-up11.2Karrow-down1external-link50 years of tax cuts for the rich failed to trickle down, economics study sayswww.cbsnews.comFenrirIII to politics • 1 month agomessage-square120cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]economics
minus-square@Surplink10•edit-229 days agoPeople should be always taxed more depending on how much more they make starting at 500,000$ a year for a single person imo. Once you hit that threshold you’re far above a normal human…far above.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish6•29 days agoYeah, the problem being that they get compensated in shares, etc, above that point, meaning they dodge all the income tax anyway.
minus-square@OmgpwnieslinkEnglish6•29 days agoIf wages/salary are your primary/only source of income, you are not part of the wealthy class, even if it is $500k. Not even close.
People should be always taxed more depending on how much more they make starting at 500,000$ a year for a single person imo. Once you hit that threshold you’re far above a normal human…far above.
Yeah, the problem being that they get compensated in shares, etc, above that point, meaning they dodge all the income tax anyway.
If wages/salary are your primary/only source of income, you are not part of the wealthy class, even if it is $500k. Not even close.