• @Cleggory
    link
    -13 hours ago

    If something affects both sides it’s effectively “a wash” and cancel each other out.

    It’s called mental gymnastics to think “two wrongs make a right.”

    • @nomous
      link
      32 hours ago

      It’s called a strawman to build an argument that was never made and then attack it.

      • @Cleggory
        link
        -12 hours ago

        You didn’t make this absurd claim?:

        If something affects both sides it’s effectively “a wash” and cancel each other out.

        If you are victimized, you believe you then have the right to also victimize “to cancel it out”?

        • @nomous
          link
          12 hours ago

          Context is important, that’s how we continue the conversation.

          If Candidate A is a genocidal maniac, and Candidate B is a genocidal maniac. It’s effectively a wash and pointless to say “well Candidate A supports genocide!”

          Hope this clarified my meaning.

          • @Cleggory
            link
            11 hour ago

            Criticizing genocide is pointless if both major candidates support it.

            Apathy has paved a basis for genocide throughout history, your view is not novel nor beneficial.

            • @nomous
              link
              11 hour ago

              Grandoise words that mean little and contribute nothing but obviously you love the smell of your own facts so go off.

              Whatever helps you sleep at night

              • @Cleggory
                link
                143 minutes ago

                Apathy was too big of a word for you??

                • @nomous
                  link
                  138 minutes ago

                  Oh I know lots of defintions. It’s especially useful sniffing out self important jackasses who love to read their own words.