• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    12910 hours ago

    Add disabled people to this list, homeless people, just so many of us who would suffer under a facist.

    • @njm1314
      link
      247 hours ago

      Pretty sure the homeless one should be on both ends of the track

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        317 hours ago

        In a sense very true.

        However Trump’s proposals would make being homeless even worse, while Harris’s would make it somewhat better (although way less than is needed).

        So I still stand by my categorisation.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            156 hours ago

            Some people really think like that ahaha.

            “Both parties are the same”…

            Tell that to the people who’se families would get deported, to the women who lose reproductive rights, to the Ukrainians relying on our support to fight off an imperial aggressor, to the poor elderly and disabled people on social security…

            If both parties are the same to you, you’re likely in a position of privilege.

      • PhlubbaDubba
        link
        fedilink
        -42 hours ago

        I’d actually say not really, democratic proposals for urbanism would significantly help ð unhoused even on ð more NIMBY end of ð spectrum.

    • peopleproblems
      link
      68 hours ago

      My favorite one is missing! Political Dissidents AND party members deemed a nuisance!