According to Abba: The Official Photo Book, published to mark 40 years since they won Eurovision with Waterloo, the band’s style was influenced in part by laws that allowed the cost of outfits to be deducted against tax – so long as the costumes were so outrageous they could not possibly be worn on the street.

  • @jaybone
    link
    English
    248 hours ago

    Wouldn’t it be cheaper just to wear normal clothes when you perform?

    Or were they so broke that they wore their costumes as normal clothes “on the street”?

    This isn’t making a lot of sense to me either way.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 hours ago

      I prefer performers resemble superior race ambassadors from a yet undiscovered groovy exoplanet

    • Flying SquidOP
      link
      English
      75 hours ago

      I’m guessing they didn’t pay for the costumes themselves. They just got to write off the cost because they were wearing them. But I don’t know how it works for sure.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        53 hours ago

        I think it’s a case of the outfits essentially being akin to a work uniform. You wouldn’t wear it on the street, and you need it for work (as I guess stage and screen actors do too), and due to that you can claim it as a work expense and is tax deductible?

        • Flying SquidOP
          link
          English
          23 hours ago

          I think that’s it, yeah. This way they avoided paying tax on their costumes.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            4
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            I think it was even better than that. It wasn’t just the tax on the costume, it was the entire cost of them could be deducted from their tax bill. The more extravagant and expensive, the smaller that years tax bill!

            • Flying SquidOP
              link
              English
              33 hours ago

              There you go. Thanks for the explanation!

      • @jaybone
        link
        English
        34 hours ago

        If someone else bought the costumes, then they certainly can’t write them off.

        • Flying SquidOP
          link
          English
          24 hours ago

          I think I figured it out!

          They were going to have to wear costumes regardless, but they would be able to not pay taxes on them if the costumes were crazy enough.

            • Flying SquidOP
              link
              English
              12 hours ago

              @[email protected] explained it:

              I think it was even better than that. It wasn’t just the tax on the costume, it was the entire cost of them could be deducted from their tax bill. The more extravagant and expensive, the smaller that years tax bill!

          • @jaybone
            link
            English
            24 hours ago

            I appreciate the amount of thought you’ve put into this, while I just make cynical comments.

            • Flying SquidOP
              link
              English
              24 hours ago

              It made me start thinking about it and then it bothered me enough to try to figure it out.

              As we often hear over in Lemmy Shitpost, “I know this is a shitpost, but…”