Now if only they could more clearly communicate when games are playable offline.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3592 months ago

    Ooh and it’s a giant yellow banner you probably won’t miss, and not some two-shades-ligher-than-the-background nonsense.

    Good job, Valve.

    • @saltesc
      link
      English
      1172 months ago

      They do this with Early Access and people still lose their shit about empty content and unfinished graphics in a game they paid $10 for.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      102 months ago

      If only they let you filter out games from being seen on your store page or showing up in recommendations using this as a criteria.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -1282 months ago

      Gamers don’t care

      If Valve was against this then they would block them from their store. This is avoiding legal consequences

      • DreamButt
        link
        English
        1712 months ago

        “”“gamers”“” aren’t a monolith

        Some people clearly care bc they are currently discussing it

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          182 months ago

          Well to be fair, we’re like 1% of all gamers. Most gamers don’t give a flying fuck and will gladly buy these products anyway. So the companies don’t really have much incentive to give a shit.

          • @pressanykeynow
            link
            English
            212 months ago

            That’s why it’s a big disturbing banner where most gamers don’t understand the text but know that big disturbing banner is bad. Will it affect the sales? Not at all. But it will raise the problem(mostly Linux anticheat) to the higher standing people in the gaming companies than before because now they require those top level managers to make a decision is it big disturbing banner or Linux anticheat.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              72 months ago

              I highly doubt this will do anything at all to sales. But I’m just guessing. Maybe it will. Hopefully! But I still applaud the change by Valve. I think it’s great.

              • @pressanykeynow
                link
                English
                92 months ago

                I don’t think the point is to do anything on sales. Valve profit from sales. It’s to raise the problem so now the managers have to decide on a scale how much they abuse the players. Before it wasn’t even a problem, now it’s Valve: “maybe you shouldn’t wink wink”

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  62 months ago

                  Well yea, I don’t think Valve wants to nuke their own sales, lol. I think they don’t want any devs doing any funny business and abusing anti cheat. That’s my guess.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Another “to be fair” - what do y’all reckon is the proportion of gamers who could define kernel? (not rhetorical)

          Edit: maybe not as good as a question as how many have any opinion on kernel-level anticheat, since you don’t need to be able to define kernel to be against the anti-cheat if you’ve heard it slows down games

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -442 months ago

          “””gamers””” aren’t a monolith

          That’s why some people discussing it aren’t going to do anything to dissuade the practice

          • @kopasz7
            link
            English
            252 months ago

            Games have been buried in negative reviews for less. We can’t tell in advance.

            But implying you know, and can speak for all people who play games is just bafflingly ignorant and conceited.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        292 months ago

        That’s fair: most probably don’t.

        I appreciate a ‘this won’t work in Linux no matter what you do’ banner on things, though.

        • @Katana314
          link
          English
          22 months ago

          I’ve been using some browser plugins for Steam that add ProtonDB information to each Store page, it’s a useful thing to have. It may even make sense to leave it as a plugin, since many Windows users won’t care.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -3
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              I don’t care what the minority of people here say

              The most popular games use kernel anti cheat, kids think cheating is bad. And very few people even know what a kernel is, they will just think it means “cheating is impossible” even though it doesn’t do that at all

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    22 months ago

                    Fair enough.

                    For what it’s worth if you’re happy with anti-cheat at the kernel level then crack on. If I don’t trust corporations with that level of access then that’s also fine.

                    This isn’t something I would ever install in my system and the two games I play Minecraft and Factorio both don’t have this issue so I’m not missing out by not playing COD 8928384 or whatever popular games use this.

      • @Harvey656
        link
        English
        92 months ago

        I’m a gamer, and absolutely fuck these damn things. I still haven’t bought helldivers 2 yet. I refuse to compromise my system for their issues.

        • @mrvictory1
          link
          English
          32 months ago

          If kernel level AC is a concern, you can play the game on Linux where “kernel” level AC runs at user level thru Wine