The question that everyone has been dying to know has been answered. Finally! What will scientists study next?

  • @PetteriPano
    link
    English
    2311 month ago

    The theorem holds true. The theorem states that the monkey has infinite time, not just the lifetime of our universe.

    That’s just lazy science to change the conditions to make sensational headlines. Bad scientists!

    • @Botzo
      link
      English
      1071 month ago

      This just in: scientists disprove validity of thought experiment; philosophers remain concerned that they’ve missed the point.

      • murmelade
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        The universe is the cage and we are the monkeys. We have already written Hamlet.

    • Ogmios
      link
      fedilink
      English
      371 month ago

      It also makes a pretty bold claim about us actually knowing the lifespan of the universe.

      • @scarabic
        link
        English
        81 month ago

        How are they defining the end of the universe?

        • @Klear
          link
          English
          161 month ago

          The universe is believed to end just a few nanoseconds before a monkey finishes writing Hamlet.

        • @HonoraryMancunian
          link
          English
          101 month ago

          Heat death would be my assumption, so between about 10^100 and 10^106 years

        • Ogmios
          link
          fedilink
          English
          01 month ago

          We know such an infinitesimally small amount about what is actually happening in the universe that any claims to be capable of predicting it’s end are patently absurd.

      • @Cryophilia
        link
        English
        41 month ago

        That’s not bold, we’ve known how long the universe will last for decades now.

        • Ogmios
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -51 month ago

          Just because someone tells you something, doesn’t mean they actually know what they’re talking about. fyi

          • @Cryophilia
            link
            English
            51 month ago

            When multiple fields of science all agree, yeah they know what they’re talking about.

            I just don’t get these anti-science types…

    • @scarabic
      link
      English
      -25
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Infinite time is undefined though. We are not sure there was time before the Big Bang. Before anyone says “but there must have been,” consider that it’s just as paradoxical and mind blowing to imagine that time never had a beginning and just stretches infinitely into the past. How can that be so? It means it would have taken an infinite amount of time for us to reach this moment in time, and that means we never would have.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        131 month ago

        Why must the concept of time before the big bang (or after our heat death) exist in our physical reality for us to speculate about theoretical infinities past those? The thought experiment is about infinite time, not all the time in our limited universe. A lot of things happen at infinity that break down as soon as you add a limit, but we’re not talking limits when we’re talking infinity.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 month ago

        I think the implications behind there being infinite time in the past are fun if you assume that the universe works like a stochastic state machine. It means that either every finite event that has happened and will happen has already happened an infinite number of times or the universe is infinitely large.