• @neatchee
    link
    42 months ago

    It was a minor aside. It was very obviously not the primary point of my reply. You chose to fixate on it. And you continue to do so. Seriously done with you now, chief. 👋

    • TheTechnician27
      link
      English
      -32 months ago

      Just a casual, minor aside of throwing the credibility of the conviction itself into question and then the casual, minor aside of falsely suggesting they aren’t cronies. 💀

      I guess it’s harder for you to make the argument this wasn’t patently corrupt when I actually challenge you on falsehoods completely misconstruing the very nature of the corruption, huh? You’d prefer I just ignore those and let them slip by, which like I get. I’d prefer it too if every game of soccer I played had no opposing goalie, but you don’t need to be so transparently salty about wanting and failing to pilot the conversation away from pointing out your BS.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        42 months ago

        Arnold absolutely sucks for what he did, I have long pointed to it as one example of why he shouldn’t be so glorified for not being completely insane as other Republicans.

        That said, the other poster you’re talking to is in the right here, you’re ignoring the point entirely.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        22 months ago

        As an third party from different country who has no idea of the topic or people involved, all I have to say that from outside perspective you’re the “villain” in this conversation, so maybe chill out and consider things?

      • @Jarix
        link
        22 months ago

        Do you stand by YOUR comment on how crooked this is, or do you admit that you exaggerated how corrupt these people are conpared to the worst of people we know to have been corrupt?

        Just answering this question. A yes i exagerated or no this is actually as bad as corruption gets are great answers if you need examples to borrow