• @phoneymouse
    link
    43 hours ago

    Most of Lemmy thinks you should vote against Kamala on principle against genocide and if Trump gets elected and makes the genocide far worse than it would’ve been under Kamala that that is a preferred outcome and somehow they won’t have blood on their hands.

    • @Ultraviolet
      link
      English
      31 hour ago

      They think it’s better to make things worse if you personally can avoid blame for it on a technicality.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -63 hours ago

      Most of Lemmy is doing mental gymnastics just like this to convince themselves that voting for the person doing genocide makes them anti genocide.

      I don’t believe they’re speaking in good faith. I think they just don’t give a shit about human lives when they’re brown and across the world.

      • @Fedizen
        link
        102 hours ago

        a vote isn’t an endorsement. Pretending the US system is some kind of idealic democracy where you are presented a platter of issues to vote on and can do those independently is delusional. We live in a perpetual trolley problem. Not pulling the lever is far more evil here.

        • HobbitFoot
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 hours ago

          Yeah. You can protest against the politician you voted for.

          • @TempermentalAnomaly
            link
            11 hour ago

            You’re protest doesn’t matter to them, only your vote. It’s not like you’re going to vote for the Republican or third party candidate.

        • @SulaymanF
          link
          -21 hour ago

          Politicians view it as an endorsement. When they get elected they say “the people have spoken” and act like they have a mandate. Bush pressed on with his Iraq war and privatizing social security after getting re elected despite those being unpopular and people voting for him in spite of those policies. Trump claimed the people supported him and hence wouldn’t release his tax records etc.

          If Harris wins she won’t feel chastised on Gaza. She said she will continue Biden’s plan even though she was given space to say what she would do differently. Even saying something mild like “Knowing what I know now, I would not have said what Biden said about Palestinians lying about death counts,” and it would have mollified many people.

          • @Fedizen
            link
            260 minutes ago

            Again this a delusional view. No democrat has ever been like “oh I lost an election, better adopt more leftwing policies”. Because nonvoting is not clear messaging it will never be effective messaging.

            • @SulaymanF
              link
              0
              edit-2
              52 minutes ago

              I disagree. The Tea Party tanked the 2010 and 2012 election for republicans but it forced them to go hard right ever since and they got everything they wanted.

              Democrats put electability over all else and compromised their principles, which is why they are in a toss up right now against an unpopular Trump with unpopular policies. This should have been an easy win, but Biden avoided meeting any Palestinians whatsoever and Harris sadly kept that up. Even minimal pandering would help and she won’t even do that. It’s not so much that she’s doing nothing for my community but Biden actively would throw insults at it (“I have zero trust for Palestinians”) and Harris won’t even distance herself from those hateful remarks. Just say he was wrong to say that and she’d get a ton of votes, I don’t even think she would lose Zionist votes like she’s afraid of.