• Flying SquidM
    link
    6
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Yes, but they don’t reverse the polarity of the neutron flow.

    Only The Doctor can reverse the polarity of something with no polarity.

    • @cmbabul
      link
      52 months ago

      I knew you was good people Squid

    • @InverseParallax
      link
      English
      3
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      So… Just as an FYI and to be that dickhole:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron_electric_dipole_moment

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nucleon_magnetic_moment

      https://inspirehep.net/literature/650244

      A nonzero electric dipole moment can only exist if the centers of the negative and positive charge distribution inside the particle do not coincide. So far, no neutron EDM has been found. The current best measured limit for dn is (0.0±1.1)×10−26 e⋅cm.[1]

      • Flying SquidM
        link
        32 months ago

        I’m going to pretend I understand that quote and move on.

        • @InverseParallax
          link
          English
          42 months ago

          We think the way the 3 quarks entangle to make a neutron could be asymmetric, such that it’s not a perfect, canceled out neutral blob.

          Up quarks have +2/3 of a charge, down quarks have - 1/3.

          Depending on how they all exist in the nucleus (quarks can’t be free, they basically have to be bound to each other, it’s why the strong force is so strong), they could overlap perfectly, or they could be next to each other like in a triangle, and we could notice that a neutron actually has a polarity where one side is slightly (impossibly slightly) more positive/negative than the other.

          Then we have polarized neutrons, and your whole life is a lie.

          But we’ve looked, and basically there’s no sign as far as we can tell, which is unfortunate, it means quarks are truly lost in the ‘quark-gluon soup’ of a hadron.