That “Little Secret” Between Trump and Johnson? Here’s What It Could Mean.
www.thenation.com
The “secret” almost certainly involves a plan to install Trump in the White House if he loses the election—but this plan could be even worse than you think.

A potential plan by Republican leaders to steal the 2024 presidential election. The plan involves delaying the certification of election results in key battleground states, potentially decreasing the overall number of electors appointed and allowing Donald Trump to win the presidency through a contingent election, whereby the House of Representatives, not the Electoral College, determines the president.

  • @grueEnglish
    64•2 months ago

    bloodless if the left allows it.

    The left should not allow a coup.

    • @4lan
      27•2 months ago

      Removed by mod

    • FenrirIII
      7•2 months ago

      I don’t think that the military would fall in line with it. There would be grave concerns

        • @Entropywins
          6•2 months ago

          You greatly underestimate our men and women in the service…it’s alright you probably haven’t served or been exposed to many service members, but if you can trust an internet stranger slightly I hope I can put your mind at ease by saying I have 100% faith from the top down in our military up holding the oath we all took.

          • @Burn_The_Right
            3•2 months ago

            You have read meanings into my comment that aren’t intended and have presumed I lack a career in military service. The U.S. military is forbidden from enforcing policy on U.S. soil by the Posse Comitatus Act.

            The military is not going to do anything about election issues or any other issues unless leadership has been compromised at large. I doubt they will be compromised.

            • @Entropywins
              4•2 months ago

              I did assume as I do a lot, but I see what you are saying now.

        • @[email protected]English
          2•2 months ago

          The marines won’t, but pentagon leadership and the army, along with the NY and CA National guards may be enough.

    • @[email protected]
      6•2 months ago

      Please. We will sit at home and cry. Or go wave signs in a street somewhere. And neither of those things will change anything.

      • @nomous
        5•1 month ago

        Idk I seem to remember a lot of “cities burning” or something during some nationwide protests a few years ago after cops killed another person, I don’t think those people have gone anywhere.

        • @WoahWoah
          0•1 month ago

          Yeah that was really amazing when they stopped police violence.

          • @nomous
            3•1 month ago

            Rome wasn’t built in a day as the saying goes. Because we make incremental progress shouldn’t mean we stop fighting. Defeatism and apathy has never won anyone anything.

            • @WoahWoah
              -1•1 month ago

              I’m just pointing out that police violence increased, not decreased, after #BLM.

              • @nomous
                3•1 month ago

                Police violence has been an epidemic for decades, ask the nearest brown guy. What we’re seeing now isn’t necessarily the increase in violence itself, but a rise in reporting and accountability, people are becoming aware of it and how often it actually happens.

                An increase in awareness doesn’t mean you lost or that it’s over.