Shouldn’t any WiFi from the last decade be sufficient? 8k with H.265 only needs a good 100mbps. Even the 15 year old 802.11n should be able to do that. Anything more modern would not even break a sweat.
Doesn’t have to be a small cheap camera. If they’re willing to go this far with an 8k TV in the bathroom i don’t see why’s the cam couldn’t be a pricey good one.
deleted by creator
Shouldn’t any WiFi from the last decade be sufficient? 8k with H.265 only needs a good 100mbps. Even the 15 year old 802.11n should be able to do that. Anything more modern would not even break a sweat.
Encoding h.265 on a small enough camera might be a problem? But if they have money …
Doesn’t have to be a small cheap camera. If they’re willing to go this far with an 8k TV in the bathroom i don’t see why’s the cam couldn’t be a pricey good one.
Nothing was said about framerate. Could be 1 FPS…
buffering
Lul fair enough. I personally would splurge for 60 frames at least if I’m going that far but that’s just me.
He just said it’s a 8k monitor, not the camera.
It says ultra -hd which is 4K and that can be transmitted wirelessly.
Which is why it’s such a strange request. Why splurge on an 8K TV if you’re only going to watch 4K video on it?