• @scarabic
    link
    English
    213 days ago

    I agree with your more sensible definition but it is a slippery concept.

    It’s a bit ambiguous what it means to say:

    unless it’s Utopia for everyone

    Is it Utopia “for” someone if it isn’t their idea of Utopia? Seems like you are saying yes.

    But if yes, then as long as current conditions meet anyone’s definition of utopia, then we’re all living in one.

    Which brings us back to the OP.

    • @FooBarrington
      link
      213 days ago

      But if yes, then as long as current conditions meet anyone’s definition of utopia, then we’re all living in one.

      No, Utopia has a defined set of meanings. If current conditions meet someone’s definition of Utopia, but doesn’t meet the defined set of meanings, it doesn’t mean current conditions are Utopia.

      • @scarabic
        link
        English
        2
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        Where exactly is this defined meaning?

        utopia (noun) an imagined place or state of things in which everything is perfect.

        According to Oxford Languages it is very much in the eye of the beholder and not objectively defined.

        • @FooBarrington
          link
          113 days ago

          Let’s go with the Cambridge definition:

          a perfect society in which people work well with each other and are happy

          The Oxford Languages definition is incomplete enough to not be a valid counter argument - “perfect” doesn’t mean everyone 100% gets what they want. The only sensible interpretation is “perfect” from a societal perspective.

          • @scarabic
            link
            English
            112 days ago

            Well we may just have to disagree. Even your definition requires that everyone be happy, and cooperating. I think that goes against your earlier contention that regardless of what people want, utopia has an objective definition.

            It is what people want it to be, and people want different things.