• @NarrativeBear
    link
    773 days ago

    I find nothing wrong with this movement, but at the same time I almost feel like this movement is exactly what “government’s” may want. Less educated individuals having children means more uneducated voters in the long run.

    Kind of like that scene in Idiocracy (2006).

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gJDcoqrh1ac

    • warm
      link
      fedilink
      483 days ago

      I thought the idea of the US version was just to avoid republicans.

    • @WhiteRabbit_33
      link
      193 days ago

      This is eugenics propaganda. It is slightly hidden in a way of not using the blatant language of “superiority” and forcing it on people, but the base idea boils down to breeding traits such as higher intelligence into (or out of in this case) people like what is done (was attempted) with animals. This is eugenics. Please do not spread eugenics.

      Eugenics does not work. There’s a lot of information on the topic, but here’s a 10-minute primer: https://youtu.be/kMBriCmiTu0

      TL;DW Studies show genetics plays a very minor role in intelligence in humans with socioeconomic factors being the main driver. Eugenics may be able to breed certain traits in/out, but that results in the extreme detriment of others. Consider dog breeding and all the health issues breeds have who were bred for a handful of specific tasks/traits.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        112 days ago

        They are talking about education, not intelligence. Children of couples with higher education will usually have a better education too.

        • @WhiteRabbit_33
          link
          22 days ago

          That wasn’t clear from their comment. The link for Idiocracy didn’t help that since that movie focuses on eugenics.

          For education, sure, but while the data shows more educated voters voted for Harris, it isn’t nearly as big of a gap as it should be. Slightly over 2/5ths of college educated voters voted for Trump, likewise slightly over 2/5ths of uneducated voters voted for Harris. The media likes to hype that divide along with all the others, but that’s a shit ton of people on both sides.

          https://www.washingtonpost.com/elections/interactive/2024/exit-polls-2024-election/

    • @wolfpack86
      link
      283 days ago

      It’s not like women turned out in droves for Harris either. Who’s going to withhold from the women that dropped the ball?

      • @CleoTheWizard
        link
        English
        153 days ago

        You don’t need to. I’ve run the numbers elsewhere but if we assume 100% of your dating pool are women and 50%-ish are liberal, even if only half of them participate it’s going to put pressure on men very quickly if they don’t want to be alone.

        Now we know those women aren’t spread equally so this movement isn’t going to be consistently effective everywhere. But in places like Texas, it would mean most of the major cities harm Republican men seeking relationships/sex.

        And taken one step further, this creates a child shortage if done for long enough. Even just 10% of women deciding not to have kids will have a big effect. People worry about conservatives just having more kids but realistically they work lower end jobs and don’t have money for that. Imagine raising 3-4 kids in this economy, not many will do that.

        • felixthecat
          link
          fedilink
          62 days ago

          Keep in mind that even in a place like texas, in major cities liberal voters far outnumber conservatives. There are millions of us voting hoping that one day the people that don’t will finally register and give the state the changes it desperately needs.

          It may look like we’re outnumbered. But the biggest problem we have by far nationwide is the amount of people that don’t vote. Conservatives are honestly outnumbered everywhere except in states like north and south Dakota that have a ton of land and low population.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          43 days ago

          People worry about conservatives just having more kids but realistically they work lower end jobs and don’t have money for that. Imagine raising 3-4 kids in this economy, not many will do that.

          I suspect there are a lot of corpos voting red, especially once you get to the C-suite. I don’t think it does any favors to anyone to assume that Trump’s sweep was just the redneck vote.

          • @CleoTheWizard
            link
            English
            43 days ago

            I’ll expound a bit. Of course there are a portion but that portion of better off conservatives is relatively small. And affluence often doesn’t result in wanting more kids.

            I think most people would agree that the average wage of a dem voter is significantly higher than that of a conservative voter even when adjusting for COL. A lot of their voters lack degrees and lack the financial situation to have a bunch of kids.

            Also keep in mind that this stuff is kind of exponential right. If 10% of women don’t have kids, they’re probably on average not having about 2 kids. So you either need 10% of other women to have 2 kids or 20% of women to have 1 extra child. That’s a big ask for your average American of any political skew. If 10% of women participate, that means 1 in 4 people need to have an extra child. And the larger that portion of participating women becomes, the exponentially greater pressure it puts on other women who want to absorb that impact.

        • @wolfpack86
          link
          02 days ago

          So why do women who doomed this country still get to enjoy the finer things?

        • @Benaaasaaas
          link
          -13 days ago

          The thing is, there are tons of incels already and if you think that will push them to be more liberal I have some bad news for you.

          • @CleoTheWizard
            link
            English
            183 days ago

            The point isn’t to isolate men and create more incels, the point is for women to stop tolerating behavior that is not worthy of rewarding with intimacy or relationship. Women shouldn’t put up with awful men that don’t care about their rights just because they’re worried that they will become even worse men.

            The point isn’t necessarily that women get what they want politically either; it’s a reaction to the majority of men displaying a lack of shared interest in their partners health and wellbeing. Not to mention that most men never have to deal with the results of these elections, now they will.

    • @lordnikon
      link
      English
      113 days ago

      Honestly I think that only works if society keeps progressing in any form for a generational time scale. Women protecting themselves and enjoying the time left. Seems like a valid course of action as anything else.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      8
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      What that would really mean is an erosion of the tax base and possibly a demographic crisis.

      But I seriously doubt that the population of femcels female volcels is getting larger as much as it is getting louder and coping in a way that makes a good headline.

      • @WoodScientist
        link
        32 days ago

        By definition, any woman choosing not to have sex due to state-imposed pregnancy risk is not a ‘femcel.’

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 days ago

        Incel means involuntarily celebrate. Women CHOOSING to not have sex is voluntary and it’s disgusting trying to compare them to the incel movement.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      4
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      When Idiocracy no longer is a comedy movie but an instruction manual…

      Always thought that would happen with 1984, not with that movie.

    • @JeeBaiChow
      link
      -13 days ago

      That’s why this form of protest is ineffective. I want to see what the ‘but gaza’ people think in a few months.