There is a table of examples in the link. Some I saw include:

Desert

  • desert Latin dēserō (“to abandon”) << ultimately PIE **seh₁- (“to sow”)
  • Ancient Egyptian: Deshret (refers to the land not flooded by the Nile)  from dšr (red)

Shark

  • shark Middle English shark from uncertain origin
  • Chinese 鲨 (shā)  Named as its crude skin similar to sand (沙 (shā))

Kayak

  • Inuktitut ᖃᔭᖅ (kayak) Proto-Eskimo *qyaq
  • Turkish kayık (‘small boat’)[17] Old Turkic kayguk << Proto-Turkic kay- (“to slide, to turn”)

A lot of these could be TIL posts of their own.

I also wonder if some of these are actually false cognates, or if there is a much earlier common origin with false associations that came afterwards

  • @SpaceNoodle
    link
    -71 month ago

    Related fun fact: emoji is the plural, and the singular is emojus!

    • kamiheku
      link
      fedilink
      171 month ago

      Well, no, it’s not, since emoji is not a Latin word. It is a fun factoid though!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Right, for sure if you were to pluralize emoji (which is singular) it wouldn’t be emojus in japanese.

        I was gonna toss some guesses here but it’s a word I don’t think you pluralize really, as we don’t in English

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          51 month ago

          Japanese doesn’t have different forms for plural, so “emoji” can be both singular and plural.

          • @thedirtyknapkin
            link
            21 month ago

            yeah, if anything they might collectivize it like “emoji-tachi”. though I’ve never heard it used that way.