• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1314 days ago

    This country will never, ever prosecute a president because it would set a precedent of holding our politicians accountable. Ain’t happening. We’ve all been watching Pelosi do insider trading for decades.

    • Nick
      link
      English
      413 days ago

      Except he’s already been prosecuted and found guilty. This is the sentencing. Now the question is will New York state sentence and imprison him before he takes office.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        183 days ago

        He’s just not going to show up and will stay in FL till after inauguration. If you think they’re going to hold politicians to the same standard as you and me you’re incredibly naïve.

      • Bakkoda
        link
        fedilink
        English
        113 days ago

        It’s gonna be interesting because we are clearly at a level of manipulation where the sheer act of being held accountable will 100% be called persecution. From here on out any attempt to hold a politician accountable will be met with resistance and end up being theatre.

    • @Jumpingspiderman
      link
      303 days ago

      As reprehensible as it is morally, Congresscritters can STILL legally trade based on their insider info they get from their Congresscritter jobs. So there’s really no crime to prosecute. There SHIOULD be, but there isn’t.

    • @AA5B
      link
      213 days ago

      Politicians doing insider trading is not limited to Pelosi, and somehow not illegal. At least Congress has more ethics standards than courts, but it’s an extremely low bar and unreasonable to be held to such lower standard than the rest of us

      • @bitjunkie
        link
        53 days ago

        The “somehow” isn’t a big leap… The people who would have to outlaw it are the exact ones benefitting from the broken status quo, same as it ever was.

    • @Timmy_Jizz_Tits
      link
      123 days ago

      Insider trading is actually legal for congress though. You’re point is valid for systemic issues but this specific one boils down to the individuals involved. There is no precedent for this, no one can really say the judge did anything improper. It would likely be a boon for the governor in a blue state and who knows the DA ambitions.

      I’m mostly making counterpoints than a prediction though. I still don’t think anything major will happen.

    • @Jtotheb
      link
      83 days ago

      Yes, the second most pressing concern in everyone’s lives after a second Trump term—Nancy Pelosi’s husband

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        33 days ago

        No one is saying that. It’s just blatant corruption in front of the entire country for everyone to see.

        • @Jtotheb
          link
          03 days ago

          Hey, you drew the comparison. The whole world of corrupt US politicians to choose from. Don’t like the conclusion people draw when they read exactly what you’ve written? Just write something else lol

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        23 days ago

        I’m concerned about Pelosi’s husband! Didn’t he get attacked by a dude with a hammer? I wouldn’t wish that on anyone

    • @Dkarma
      link
      23 days ago

      Faaallllseee equivalennnnnceeee