• @Lasherz12
    link
    101 month ago

    No, and neither did Germany.

    • @BangelaQuirkel
      link
      71 month ago

      Maybe I’m not getting something here, but why do you think Germany didn’t have a socialist party?

      • @Lasherz12
        link
        121 month ago

        Because at the time of the Nazi takeover, the party with that name was wholly operating as a rubber stamp to the most extremist right wing elements taking hold of their party. “The Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea” is similarly nondescriptive as “German Worker’s Party” later purposely misleadingly named to “National Socialist German Workers’ Party” after Hitlers rise.

        • @BangelaQuirkel
          link
          11
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Ah I see. Yes, no doubt the NSDAP wasn’t socialist but that doesn’t mean Germany didn’t have socialist parties back then. E.g. the social democrats were still marxist, iirc.

          As an aside it is very saddening that people really think the nazis were leftists because of the name. That’s just a level of stupidity I can’t fathom to comprehend.

          • @CharlesDarwin
            link
            English
            1
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            As an aside it is very saddening that people really think the nazis were leftists because of the name.

            Republicans have spent a lot of time and money spreading that propaganda. Which is interesting, because today’s Nazis, just like the OG Nazis, cannot WAIT to start killing anyone that is or might be a “Communist”. But somehow Nazis are Communists/leftists.

            No one ever accused magaforbrains of being smart.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          41 month ago

          They weren’t calling Nazis “socialist,” they were clearly referring to actual socialists in Weimar Germany.