• NoiseColor
    link
    English
    11 month ago

    I understand you are hurt and angry.

    But you have to understand there are people out there from all around the world, that have no desire to observe the grotesque circus of american politics. You are in your own bubble of people that think the world has ended, but most people in the world have different worries and concerns.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 month ago

      Most people have the concern that the Trump concept is being copied to their country’s politics now.

      • NoiseColor
        link
        English
        11 month ago

        No. Not at all. Most people don’t think about it. They go about their business and think about their job, their kids,spouses, friends, cars, … They think about their local politics, not in relation to American. Than if they do think about american politics, they say to themselves: what a bunch of clowns, then they think of something else.

    • @Buffalox
      link
      English
      -4
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I understand you are hurt and angry.

      That’s ad hominem.

      But you have to understand there are people out there from all around the world

      That doesn’t change anything, whatever country you are from, using Xitter means you are using and thereby supporting a fascist platform.

      You are in your own bubble

      OK, and which bubble is that?
      Seems to me that the ones in a bubble are those that continue to use Xitter, oblivious to it supporting fascism, or accepting that it does. Now THAT’s being in a bubble.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 month ago

        I don’t have any skin in this game but just want to point out that “I understand you are hurt and angry” is an attempt to empathize with you, and not an ad hominem fallacy.

        • @Buffalox
          link
          English
          0
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          He/She doesn’t understand anything, he/she doesn’t know me.

          If the comment was along the lines of: I understand IF you are hurt and angry, it would be different and not presumptuous. But that he continues with: “But you have to understand…” Like he is talking to a child, confirms the interpretation of an ad hominem IMO."

          But thanks for pointing out a possibly poorly worded good intention. But the way he wrote it, it looks like an ad hominem to me.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            01 month ago

            You don’t just get to call any words that you don’t like, or even words directly attacking you, an ad hominem. A statement is only an ad hominem if 1) it’s attempting to refute an argument 2) by attacking the character/motive of the person making the argument INSTEAD OF the actual content of the argument. “Your argument is wrong because you’re an idiot” is an ad hominem. What the other commenter said to you is not. Note that people claiming “ad hominem” on statements that are not are sometimes said to be committing an “ad hominem fallacy fallacy.”

            https://laurencetennant.com/bonds/adhominem.html

            • @Buffalox
              link
              English
              0
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              A statement is only an ad hominem if 1) it’s attempting to refute an argument 2) by attacking the character/motive of the person

              Which is EXACTLY what he did. And I even explained that in my previous post.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                0
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                Ok buddy, you only quoted part of what I said. Did you even read the post I linked to? You’re wrong; it’s cool though, we all make mistakes. Accept it and move on.

                • @Buffalox
                  link
                  English
                  0
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  Ok buddy, you only quoted part of what I said.

                  I took the part that was essential. Your claim about the below is essentially the same argument.

                  Your argument is wrong because you’re an idiot

                  That’s the same as your argument is wrong, because you are angry and hurt, (and therefore not rational). Both are attacks on the person and not the argument. Although one is more polite than the other.

                  And oh he also claimed i was living in a bubble, so he actually made 3 comments that were ill camouflaged personal attacks, first on my emotional state, 2nd on my rationality, and finally claiming I’m uninformed from living in a bubble.

                  Yet I’m the one downvoted for calling his ad hominem out.
                  The fact that X is used outside USA is obvious, thinking he needs to “explain” that is ridiculous, and I live in EU, so I think I’m aware of that. And Xitter definitely also has a fascist agenda outside USA, but maybe he isn’t aware of that?

                  None of the 3 attacks (non arguments) were ever qualified any further, probably because he can’t.

                  But I understand why you are hurt and angry, but you must understand you are wrong, because “obvious fact”, and you live in a Bubble.

                  So do you think that’s an OK comment to our discussion? Because that’s EXACTLY what the comment by NoiseColor to me boils down to. It’s an even bigger ad hominem when put together.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    1
                    edit-2
                    1 month ago

                    So do you think that’s an OK comment to our discussion?

                    I’m not passing any judgement on whether anything is an “OK comment.” In fact, on the topic being discussed, I think I agree with you more than the person you’re replying to. As I said though, I only stopped by to comment on your fallacious claim that the person committed an ad hominem, because it’s super fucking annoying to me when people throw that term around when they don’t know what they’re doing.

                    you must understand you are wrong, because “obvious fact”

                    THIS PART IS THE PERSON’S ARGUMENT, no matter how good or bad as it might be, and no matter how much it is surrounded by words that you view as insulting. In fact, if anyone is resorting to an ad hominem here, it’s you, by attacking their character and dancing around the actual meat of their argument (again, as good or bad as it might be). Therefore I hope you agree with me that the other commenter did not commit an ad hominem fallacy. Or did you not read the link I posted yet?

      • NoiseColor
        link
        English
        -11 month ago

        I see that the emotional level is too great for any discussion. Good luck to you, I hope you get a moment for yourself and have a nice rest of the day.

        Good bye.

        • @Buffalox
          link
          English
          -31 month ago

          I see you are unable to actually argue your point, and instead choose to continue with the ad hominem.
          I’m still interested to hear what bubble it is you consider me to be in?

          • @Shardikprime
            link
            English
            11 month ago

            I’m just gonna go ahead and say it:

            You need to touch grass as in pronto