• @NateNate60
    link
    -93 hours ago

    Unpopular opinion: snap is not so bad and genuinely useful for many things

    I would rather have a snap than building from source or use some tar.gz archive with a sketchy install script

    • @m4m4m4m4
      link
      17
      edit-2
      37 minutes ago

      some tar.gz archive with a sketchy install script

      I just can’t… like maybe I’m too old and that’s why I still can’t wrap my head around how we went from “./configure && make & make install scripts are almost the de facto way to install software in linux” to “a sketchy install script”. We’re living interesting times at Linux

      • @fireflash38
        link
        English
        442 minutes ago

        Blame the thousands of supply chain attacks.

      • @RoyaltyInTraining
        link
        239 minutes ago

        Last time I ran a corporate-made installer, it caused massive graphical glitches and lock-ups after waking from sleep. It basically gave my system computer-AIDS.

        That’s why I never run scripts which are too long for me to easily understand outside a sandbox. Official distro repositories and Flatpaks are the only sources I have some level of trust in.

    • @EtherWhack
      link
      044 minutes ago

      I’d rather be able to use my web browser uninterrupted without it being updated while using it and be forced to restart it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        110 minutes ago

        The updates download in the background and will install when you exit the snapped app. If you really don’t want automatic updates, you can run snap refresh --hold to hold all automatic updates or add a snap name to hold updates for that snap.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          113 minutes ago

          A built-in way to have services running (which is why openprinting can make a snap of CUPS but AFAICT can’t make a Flatpak).