• OpenStars
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 month ago

      The author died >100 years ago, so the entire text is public domain if anyone wants to read it. https://en.m.wikisource.org/wiki/Flatland

      I don’t like reading books on a screen but… it is hard to pass up free - then again, libraries also exist and THIS BOOK IS WORTHWHILE.

      I could barely put it down the entire time I read it, it just consumed me.

      Just a note, it is actually so offensive to a woman’s role in society that many (most? I have no idea) scholars think that it was so over-the-top that it must have been meant as a critique of the then-status-quo.

      This book has fucking VISION, even centuries into the future.

      img

      Hopefully it won’t remain so for millennia as well - bc of the thoughts finally becoming commonplace in society; but even then it would remain as a historical milestone towards that fantastic end.:-)

      • @CarbonatedPastaSauce
        link
        English
        41 month ago

        Your passion makes an excellent case on its own. You convinced me to give it a shot, I’ll look for it at the library. I hope they have it.

          • @CarbonatedPastaSauce
            link
            English
            31 month ago

            Alright so I went to the library and they are getting a copy from another branch, should have it in a few days.

            I think the librarian was kinda impressed I asked for a book from the 1880’s. 😆

            • OpenStars
              link
              fedilink
              English
              330 days ago

              Hehehe, you haven’t even touched the book yet and are considered smarter already:-).

      • AwesomeLowlander
        link
        fedilink
        21 month ago

        Just a note, it is actually so offensive to a woman’s role in society that many (most? I have no idea) scholars think that it was so over-the-top that it must have been meant as a critique of the then-status-quo.

        The author outright stated that it was meant as a critique in the 2nd edition, so there’s no need to guess :)

        • OpenStars
          link
          fedilink
          English
          130 days ago

          Was that the actual author, or a statement added on their behalf? I thought I recalled reading it as the latter, where it seemed they were just guessing.

          Either way it could be a kind of trigger warning for someone who even knowing that wouldn’t want to read the text.

          • AwesomeLowlander
            link
            fedilink
            230 days ago

            It was the actual author, who got annoyed that people couldn’t recognise satire. Not much different from today, in other words 😂

            • OpenStars
              link
              fedilink
              English
              230 days ago

              Hehe. Thanks for sharing that.

              In fairness, there are a LOT of kinds of people in the world - e.g. I would have thought that someone advocating to block access to medically necessary abortions would surely have been satire but… nope.

              As with any form of message passing, the meaning depends on both the sender and the recipient - I would argue far more so the former, but some extremely selfish people would just as vehemently argue that the latter is all that matters to them.🤷