“The truth is that from a legal perspective, these resolutions are not complicated,” Sanders said during a press conference Tuesday, alongside Sens. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md.; Peter Welch, D-Vt.; and Jeff Merkley, D-Ore. “They are cut and dry. The United States government is currently in violation of the law, and every member of the Senate who believes in the rule of law should vote for these resolutions.”

Despite aid groups reporting that Israel has continued to block humanitarian aid into Gaza, the White House overlooked the blown deadline last week, saying that it will continue to provide weapons to Israel. The decision stands in direct violation of existing U.S. law preventing the government from sending weapons to countries that block U.S.-backed humanitarian assistance.

With the Biden administration unwilling to act and legislation targeting pro-Palestinian nonprofits still advancing, pro-Palestinian advocates and their allies in Congress argue that passing the joint resolutions is likely the last real opportunity for Democrats to address the crisis in Gaza before Republicans take control in January.

Despite Democrats’ unwillingness to vote for conditioning military aid to Israel in the past, Araabi hopes that at least some of the lame-duck senators who won’t be returning in January will take this opportunity to cement an anti-genocide record.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      I mean, trump pardoned a bunch of us government contracted (by the military) mercenaries who were convicted(by a US federal Court) of killing Iraqi civilians in 2014. The act of pardoning such criminals is in itself a war crime, and occurred in 2020.

      • @Rapidcreek
        link
        113 hours ago

        It wasn’t a bunch, it was one guy. He was court marshalled, and his own men testified against him. He was found guilty and stripped of rank. He was about to be sentenced to federal lockup for war crimes. THEN Trump pardoned him against the wishes of the US Military. I think your apples and oranges comparison failed.

    • @Carmakazi
      link
      513 hours ago

      Not this decade, but during the battles of Fallujah we gave the civilians there 24 hours to evacuate, and then after that the official rules of engagement were pretty damn close to “everyone left is presumed to be an Al Qaeda militant.” They were allowed to shoot people with phones or radios in their hands on sight. We also bombed the fuck out of that city, including with white phosphorous. We know WP was used because there was a recorded friendly fire incident with it.

      And all of this was basically reprisal for the killings of those four Blackwater mercenaries.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        112 hours ago

        Not this decade

        So, no?

        I can answer for you. The US betrayal of their Kurdish allies was evil and that was fairly recent.

      • @Rapidcreek
        link
        -113 hours ago

        The reason white phosphorus was used in Fallujah. If you’ve ever been to an Arab city, you’ll note that sometimes in markets, cloth is hung over the streets. This cloth provides shade to shoppers. Fallujah had more of that than usual, it masked movement from sight overhead. So, to get rid of it, they dropped white phosphorus to burn it away.

        • @kreskin
          link
          13 hours ago

          right, also known as a war crime.

        • @Carmakazi
          link
          513 hours ago

          A logical and strategic justification. Still a literal warcrime.

          • @Rapidcreek
            link
            -112 hours ago

            Not really. White phosphorus is used for many things, mostly making smoke. It only becomes a crime when you use it against people.

            • @kreskin
              link
              13 hours ago

              And, blocked user. You have yourself a nice day now “rapidcreek”